The answer is superseding. An intervening cause will by and large clear the tortfeasor of obligation for the casualty's damage just if the occasion is esteemed a superseding cause. A superseding cause is an unforeseeable intervening cause. By differentiate, a predictable intervening cause commonly does not break the chain of causality, implying that the tortfeasor is as yet in charge of the casualty's damage—unless the occasion prompts an unforeseeable outcome.
I think you forgot to give the options along with your question. I am answering the question based on my research and knowledge. "They shared similar marriage customs" is the one that <span>was a common theme shared by the Mayan and Aztec civilizations. I hope that the answer has come to your help.</span>
Answer: b. Graves Protection and Repatriation Act.
The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act is the only one of these acts that did not impact Asian Americans. The act was enacted in November 1990, and it requires institutions that receive federal funding to return Native American items to the descendants of the tribes. This includes human remains, funerary objects and other cultural items. It also establishes procedures for the inadvertent discovery of those items.
Answer:
Cognitivism
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various psychologists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this statement fits most closely with ideas from the school of thought known as Cognitivism. This is a form of understanding that uses mental processes, including how people perceive, think, remember, learn, solve problems, and direct their attention to one stimulus rather than another. Which by focusing on interpreting the teachers answer you are demonstrating cognitivism.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
