Hi !!
The conclusion to Damian's argument is positive as he is aware of what the problem still is the second one ===>
-
EXPLANATION
<u>He cannot say</u><u> </u>:
1- it's absurd that we have this problem when there is such an easy solution, <em>because he wants things to change</em>
<u>He knows that </u>:
1- Unfortunately, more 100 million plastic grocery bags are still being thrown away every year.
2- Although attempts have been made to recycle these plastic bags, the problem cause by them still exists.
So it's conclusion is that we have to change ►
<u>We need</u> to take active steps and change <u>our habits</u> by using reusable bags instead.
hope this helps ☺☺☺
I think B is correct, tell me if I am wrong. I hope I helped you!
Hmm, a strong argument typically includes a statement of one's own opinion, then your opponent's counterclaim, and reasons why the counterclaim is inaccurate or invalid. For instance, Tammy could have started off with a statement about how animal safety benefits the animals, and then address the counterclaim about it being expensive by stating it doesn't just help the animals, but the people as well. I think the answer here is false because Tammy's speech didn't include an argument about how expensive animal safety is. So false. I hope this helps, sorry it's so long.
an application with a lot about you like with your traits and if you're hard working and your hours you can work
