<span>If nominal gdp is $12 trillion and real gdp is $10 trillion, then the gdp deflator is: </span><span>120, and this indicates that the price level has increased by 20 percent since the base year.</span>
<span>
GDP deflator reflect the effects of new prices to the product that produced domestically.
It calculated with this equation:
GDP Deflator = GDP Nominal/Real GDP x 100
= 12 Trllion /10 Trillion x 100
= 120</span>
Answer:
c. a significant amount of market power
Explanation:
Cross price elasticity measures the responsiveness of quantity demanded of a good to the changes in price of another good.
If the cross price elascitiy is postive, the goods are subsituites.
If the cross price elasticity is negative, the goods are complementary goods.
If the cross price elasticitiy is low the firm has market power. It means that it's consumers do not change the quantity demanded when the price of the good changes
If the cross price elasticitiy is high, the market has low market power.
I hope my answer helps you.
Answer:
The answer is: A) degree to which the data is an accurate portrait of the target population.
Explanation:
To explain data generalizability I like to use election polls as an example. There are over 200 million voters in the US, and polls only cover a few thousands of voters, it is impossible to survey the whole population. Data generalizability refers to how well does the election polls reflect the real outcome of an election. Can the data sample used in the polls serve as a true parameter to know the real outcome of the election? Some polls are accurate and others aren't, accurate polls have high data generalizability.
Answer: No. It does not violate Title VII if Cynthia's employer does not grant her the leave.
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Cynthia, requested a two-week leave from her employer to go on a religious pilgrimage and that the pilgrimage was not a requirement of her religion, but Cynthia felt it was a calling from God.
Based on the scenario, Title VII is not violated if Cynthia's employer does not grant her the leave. According to the court, when an employee says that based on his or her religious belief, he or she is required to go to a pilgrimage, the person has to prove beyond reasonable doubt.
In this case, her church which is the Roman Catholic didn't call for a pilgrimage as it was her personal choice. Therefore, Title VII is not violated if Cynthia's employer does not grant her the leave.