Answer:
C. Both similarities and differences in their properties.
Hope it helps!
Brainliest would be nice if you want to of course. :)
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
In fables we are usually taught a moral so that we can grow responsibly. But since kids find life lessons boring, fables were made because they are good stories that aren't boring but still teach a life lesson in the end.
Miranda v. Arizona is the U.S. Supreme Court case that condemned using psychological coercion, engaging in trickery or deceit, holding a suspect incommunicado, or making promises that can't be kept.
The Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court ruling (1966) ruled that arrested persons have rights to self-discrimination and lawyers under the fifth and sixth amendments to the United States Constitution.
The Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects must be informed of their constitutional rights against defense counsel and self-incrimination before cross-examinating police.
the majority opinion by Earl Warren. Article 5 of the Constitutional Amendment requires law enforcement authorities to advise suspects on their right to remain silent during police detention interrogations and to consult lawyers.
Learn more about Miranda v. Arizona here: brainly.com/question/1307890
#SPJ4
This is true because they wanted better opportunities for farming and to make more money
Answer:
Colonizers were in the case of the Spanish, French and the Chesapeake Bay colony lower nobility, common folk, or indentured servants, while for New England they were religious migrants, and for Dutch settlements merchants and sailors.
Spanish and French proclaimed thier missionary role, and "rescue" of natives, and the colonies in New England also detailed their mission to construct a "city on the hill",while Dutch and English in Chesapeake both were aimed at maximizing profit.
The interaction with environments and natives was influenced by this aims, as Spanish and French colonies tried to assimilate natives like free subjects but with their speficic culture if that did not clash with the Catholic doctrine, and emphasizing conversion and tribute, in the specific case of the French via the fur trade, while for Spanish it would be the <em>encomienda</em> system and later the "hacienda" (latifundia). Dutch engaged primarily with natives as trading partners, not seeking integration, and also without transforming the environment. English for the other did change the environment and clashed with the Natives, althoug at first they used them as life support, due to their poor knowledge of the terrain, but eventually the colonist clashed with the natives.
