False. It does not reduce market risk.
According to the theory of the invisible hand, when there is competition, self-interested decisions advance the society interests.
<h3>What is the invisible hand theory?</h3>
Adam Smith, a Scottish philosopher and economist, popularized the metaphor of the "invisible hand" to describe the processes by which positive social and economic consequences may result from the collective self-interested acts of individuals, none of whom intend to produce such outcomes.
<h3>How is Adam Smith's invisible hand idea still applicable today?</h3>
An important economic idea that is still relevant today is the invisible hand theory. It may provide insight into the operation of free markets and consumer behavior. Although the idea is significant, it is frequently applied in ways that are inconsistent with Smith's original text or out of context.
<h3>What exactly is the "invisible hand" and why is it significant?</h3>
The term "invisible hand" describes how an individual's self-interests help society as a whole. In other words, through pursuing the profit motive, individuals are required to offer commodities at a cost that others are prepared to pay. Society gains as a result since those goods might not have been created otherwise.
learn more about invisible hand theory here
<u>brainly.com/question/3078419</u>
#SPJ4
An experiment that could test the Premack differential probability rule is as per the following; the kids are given two reaction choices, one for playing pinball machine and another for eating confection and these practices are evaluated to figured out which is more plausible for every kid. A portion of the youngsters who discovered to favor one movement. In the second period of the trial, the testing of the youngsters was directed with one oF the two systems. In the primary strategy, eating was a fortifying reaction while playing pinball was the instrumental reaction implying that the youngsters played pinball keeping in mind the end goal to eat the confection.
