Answer:
D. No, because the barber had no opportunity to oversee the contractor's actions.
Explanation:
If the customer sues the barber for his injuries, he is not likely to prevail because the barber was not the one that hired the contractor that installed the awning that collapsed and there is not prove that the barber didn't take the necessary precautions to protect his customers from dangerous conditions as the case states that the awning collapsed without warning so negligence can't be argued. According to this, the answer is no, because the barber had no opportunity to oversee the contractor's actions.
You have rights that cant be taken away, you'll be able to vote when you are of age
Answer:
7
Explanation:
character vs. character, character vs. society, character vs. nature, character vs. technology, character vs. supernatural, character vs. self, and character vs. fate.
Answer:
it is d the most coomon senese one u need to look confindeint.
Explanation: