Answer:
The Great Compromise was a compromise between large states and small states on the formation of a new constitution.
Explanation:
After American independence the Articles of Confederation resulted in many challenges in the smooth functioning of the state, and a convention was called to discuss the fomation of a new constitution also known as the Constitutional Convention 1987. Two alternatives were proposed: first was the Virginia Plan, and second the New Jersey Plan. According to the Virginia Plan there would be three branches of government namely legislature, executive and judiciary. Legislature would consist of two houses: upper and lower. And representation in these houses would be based on population. On the other hand the New Jersey Plan also proposed three branches of government. It, however, called for a single house legislature with powers of trade and taxation with each state having one vote. Small states opposed Virginia Plan; Virginia was a large state. Whereas large states opposed the New Jersey Plan; New Jersey was a small state. In the final plan a compromise was reached also known as the Great Compromise. According to the final plan the legislature would consist of two houses: the Senate and the House of Representatives. Each state would have equal members in Senate; in the House of Representatives the member would be based on population. The money bill would originate from House of Representative; this satisfied the large states. This plan also served the interests of small states by giving them more seats in upper house than they could otherwise have.
Answer: China is located in East Asia.
Explanation:
Answer:The problem with Palestine after the First World War was that the British had expressed promises both to the Arab people in the land and to Jewish Zionists who wanted to settle the land.
Answer:
enemies
Explanation:
The stamp tax was an increase in taxes on commodities for the colonies in North America. These increases gave no added benefit in return, like representation in government.
Answer:
Your individual rights guarantee individuals rights to certain freedoms without interference from the government or other individuals. ... Since the United States is a democracy, the rights and equality of each individual in society are of the utmost importance—in theory and in practice. The human rights discourse is accepted by practically every government. A state can hardly portray itself openly as a violator of human rights. But how do we turn this discourse into public policy? We propose using the tools developed by New Public Management and applying them to the public policy cycle, which can be given additional substance by unpacking the obligations, essential elements, and cross-cutting principles of human rights.
Explanation:
https://sur.conectas.org/en/public-policies-human-rights-perspective/
