1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nezavi [6.7K]
3 years ago
11

Which of these groups benefited least from 19th-century imperialism?

History
2 answers:
andre [41]3 years ago
7 0
"<span>C. Colonies of imperial nations, such as Congo and India" would be the best option, since most of Europe's colonies during this time were heavily exploited in terms of people and resources. </span>
Simora [160]3 years ago
4 0

Answer

Colonies of imperial nations, such as Congo and India,benefited least from 19th-century imperialism.

Explanation.

Imperialism is a situation where the strongest and powerful nations interns of power, economy and also politically stable , dominates other countries politically ,socially and also economically.

Rapid expansion of colonial empires in the late 19th century .Nationalism helped in promoting it as political leaders expanded their support for the states showing off about their achievements in colonial war .

You might be interested in
The United Nations replaced the _____.
wel
I think the answer might be League of Nations. I hope this works for ya!
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
DO Y'ALL SEE THIS?<br> Whoops! Report "MY" Questions Again There Will Be Problems
kakasveta [241]

Answer:

That has been happening to me too!!! :(

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
How did the bracero program help address problems that New Mexico faced
kirill115 [55]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Because bracero said that he will provide food at a reasonable cost but isnt food a   resource yes it is.

7 0
3 years ago
1. guaranteed by the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments and certain acts of Congress cosmonaut 2. sharp diplomatic conflict po
Kisachek [45]

Answer:

2 is the cold war

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2. If there had not been a system of military alliances in place in Europe in 1914, would the assassination of Archduke Franz Fe
Softa [21]
This question is mostly a matter of opinion. In my opinion, it would not have resulted in World War I. The assassination of the Archduke created a conflict between Serbia and Austria-Hungary. However, because of all of the alliances in Europe at the time, many other countries were dragged into the conflict as well. So, if the alliances were not in place, the war would not have expanded across Europe and become a "World War."
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Did the attacks by abolitionists strengthen or weaken sectionalism in the south
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following events did not work out as planned as per the CIA
    11·2 answers
  • Please help me with this ASAP! Please legit answers only!
    5·1 answer
  • Why did the Battle of Thermopylae become legendary?
    13·1 answer
  • People trained in a certain skill or craft such as pottery, building, weaving etc., are called:
    14·1 answer
  • What ya'll doin for Spring Breaks??
    14·2 answers
  • Which one is more effective ?
    10·1 answer
  • Why is Bryan in godly heroes worth remembering
    6·1 answer
  • OMG PLEASE HELP ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    12·1 answer
  • Britain decided it needed to tax the colonists. However, the colonists became upset over the taxing. Why?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!