The answer to the question is A
Yes it is because it is crossing over two different things to get something that you do not normally have and have something that was not made to be here
Answer:
Before accepting brain imaging studies, the inquiries that I would pose before believing these discoveries to be legitimate are:
Did the investigation show up in a peer-reviewed journal?
peer-reviewed implies presenting the exploration papers to different specialists for an alternate and free audit before accepting it. It is perhaps the most ideal way of finding out the reality of the study and how right the outcomes are. It is in every case great to go for the subsequent feeling.
How large was the sample?
Clearly more the members in an examination, progressively substantial are its outcomes. This is to learn that there were a serious measure of individuals whose brain were examined.
Did the scientists control for key contrasts?
Assorted variety or sex parity ought to be there while contemplating the examples. One shows signs of improvement result when the investigation of populace is as homogenous as conceivable in light of the fact that it permits the specialists to reduce or diminish the quantity of contrasts that may influence the examination or result.
<span>we estimate that identical twins with Down syndrome occur at the rate of 1 or 2 in a million pregnancies and non-identical twins at the rate of 14/15 in a million. If the likelihood of having a twin or twins with Down syndrome is also linked to a family history of twins, to age or to assisted pregnancies, we presume these factors will play a part in increasing the risk for some individuals.</span>