Answer:
Scholars writing about historical events, people, objects, or ideas produce secondary sources because they help explain new or different positions and ideas about primary sources. These secondary sources generally scholarly books, including textbooks, articles, encyclopedias, and anthologies.
Well, at the 52 B.C. Roman conquering of the Paris basin, it was already an important crossroads between river and road travel (a place where a major north-south route crossed the Seine river across its central island), but it is not certain that the area was the major habitation then (the nearest known major Celtic population centre was in today's Sens). Anyway, the Romans took an interest Paris' island it for its strategic position for a garrison and lightly fortified it, but when it later become a trading centre, Gallo-Roman growth spread to the Left Bank.
Depending on the culture and that's how they view women's rights. That's where the balance comes in.
Answer D
It's not answer A because its wording does not make sense. Along with that, It's not B or C because practicing new skills is only a part of why they made tools, and to learn a craft also doesn't make sense. So, it just made life easier to have tools.
<span>The correct answer should be The English colonists moved onto American Indian land and expected the American Indians to obey colonial law. The Natives were observed as wildlings and if they wanted to obey laws then all was good, you could trade with them and be friendly. If not then nobody would do anything with them.</span>
