Answer:
Income = $30,000
Explanation
<em>Whenever a company is faced with a limiting factor i.e a resource in short supply, the company should allocate the resource to the product </em><u><em>with he highest contribution per unit of the scare resource</em></u>
Product Cont/unit machine hr /unit cont/hr Ranking
A $8 2 hrs $4/hr 2nd
B $18 3 hrs $6/hr 1st
<em>Hence the company should allocate the resource to the product B</em>
<em>Hence the total contribution</em>
= 5000 hrs × $6 per hr.
= $30,000
Income = $30,000
The newest version of a product like Crutchfield headphones is likely to use price skimming, while the new version of Monster Energy is likely to use penetration pricing
<h3>What is
price skimming?</h3>
Price skimming is a pricing strategy that a company can use when launching a new product or service.
Electronic products, such as the Apple iPhone, frequently use a price-cutting strategy during the initial launch period. Then, after competitors launch competing products, such as the Samsung Galaxy, the price of the product drops to maintain the product's competitive advantage.
The pricing strategy will be influenced by the stage of the product's life cycle. The process of charging a relatively high price for a product is referred to as price skimming. Skimming is commonly used when a product is new to the market (in its introduction or growth phase) and has few competitors.
To know more about price skimming follow the link:
brainly.com/question/15371394
#SPJ4
On the bottom of what ? Can you please take a pic of the question
Answer:
The-buying manager's-conduct should-be-relied upon to-expand Southern's-hazard by-expanding its-presentation to-potential-supply-deficiencies or-confounded conveyances
Trust in business is an incredibly dubious notion. It depends on the shared fulfillment of included gatherings, and the apparent life span of their relationship. There might be a clouded side to it - regarding "defilement/pay off", "preference", "nepotism" and so forth which may prompt "an underestimated, one-sided demeanor" and in the end bargain "quality" - antagonistically influencing the business' prosperity.
Presently, given this thought, you may acknowledge why Southern Supply Inc. had a buying approach of acquiring its items/administrations from an expanded pool of specialist co-ops. It is actually as the mainstream saying goes - "One-ought not-put-every one of their-eggs-into-one-bin"
Answer:
a) Qs = 50 + 20p - 7ps
= 50 + 20p - 7×(2)
= 50 + 20p - 14
= 36 + 20p
At equilibrium,
=
So, 150 - 10p + 5
= 36 + 20p
So, 20p + 10p = 30p
= 150 - 36 + 5
= 114 + 5
So, p = (114/30) + (5/30)
= 3.8 + 0.17
Thus,
= 3.8 + 0.17
Q = 36 + 20p
= 36 + 20(3.8 + 0.17
)
= 36 + 76 + 3.4
= 112 + 3.4
Thus,
= 112 + 3.4
b)
= 3.8 + 0.17
= 3.8 + 0.17×(5)
= 3.8 + .85
= 4.65
= 112 + 3.4
= 112 + 3.4(5)
= 112 + 17
= 129
c) Qd = 150 - 10p + 5pb = 150 - 10(2.5) + 5(5) = 150 - 25 + 25 = 150
Qs = 36 + 20p = 36 + 20(2.5) = 36 + 50 = 86
Thus, there is excess demand as
> 
d) New
= 180 - 10p + 5
= 180 - 10p + 5×(5)
= 180 - 10p + 25
= 205 - 10p
Now, new
=
gives,
205 - 10p = 36 + 20p
So, 20p + 10p = 205 - 36
So, 30p = 169
So, p = 169÷30
So,
= 5.63
Q = 205 - 10p = 205 - 10×(5.63) = 205 - 56.3 = 148.7
So,
= 148.7