<span>Washington and Oregon receive much more of their electricity through hydroelectric means than would the Great Plains. These two states have numerous rivers that flow through it, allowing for it to be converted to electricity much easier than in the Midwest, which has much fewer rivers and smaller elevation changes that would make such conversions easier.</span>
Answer: the Command School of jurisprudential thought
Explanation: In the command school of jurisprudential thought, the laws are passed solely to satisfy the needs of the ruling class. Passing a law for a certain group to be enlisted in the army is simply to satisfy the needs of the rulers.
1. A. Validity
In research, validity refers to whether the study actually represent the real life situation in its claim.
If the questions do not related to pathological gambling in any sense, the conclusion from the study would stray away from the actual cause that might influence the gambling. This make the data from the study cannot be used in any way or form to draw a conclusion.
2. A. Content validity
Content validity refers to whether the researchers have include all measures that could possibly influence the result of the research. Content validity must exist to ensure that the researchers could make the best possible conclusion for the phenomenons that occurs during the researches.
3. C. Known-groups paradigm
Known-groups paradigm refers to a situation where the researchers could ensure the validity of a certain research by including the group that they can control/discriminate. This group tend to filled with subjects with the same characteristic that can influence the result of the research.
4. B. Criterion validity.
Criterion validity commonly consist of predictive validity and concurrent validity. Concurrent validity is used to create a comparison among the measurements and outcome created by the measurement at the same time. Predictive validity on the other hand is used to create a comparison among the measurements and outcome created by the measurement that occurs later in the future.
Answer:
That argument is an example of a falacy masquerading as a valid inference.
Explanation:
Fallacy means error, deception or falsehood. Usually a fallacy is a misconception that is conveyed as true, misleading others. On the other hand, when an argument conveying a true idea is used to derive a false conclusion from false assumptions, the inference is valid.
Based on this, we can conclude that the argument quoted in the above question is a fallacy disguised as valid inference, because the speaker of the argument provides the information as a true statement, but it is wrong to draw conclusions about how Anthony will react after his accident, based on how other people reacted.