There are three ways to separate a run-on sentence: use a semicolon, use a comma and a conjunction, or put a period and capitalize the first letter in the next word. In this case, we have to do the final option, because we have to make two separate sentences; the other options will make a compound sentence.
1. Queen Elizabeth I knighted Raleigh, and he was appointed captain of the Queen's guard. He later set sail on an unsuccessful search of El Dorado, the legendary city of gold.
In this case, we put a period after 'guard' and capitalize the 'h' in 'he' because that is the point where the sentence can be separated into two complete sentences.
2. Queen Elizabeth liked Raleigh, however, her successor, King James I, did not. In 1603, he was accused of plotting against the king and sentenced to death, but only served 12 years.
We separate this sentence between 'not' and 'in' for the same reasons that we separated the first. That is the part of the sentence where it can be separated into two sentences that function on their own.
Hope this helps!
A motive is a need or want that's strong enough to cause the person to seek satisfaction.
What does Motive mean?
A reason or purpose for an action or behaviour is referred to as a motive. It is something that causes a person to act, feel, or think in a certain way.Motive is required for any action because it is the underlying reason for why someone takes action. Motive is the impetus or driving force that drives someone to do something.
What does driving force means?
A driving force is a powerful and motivating factor that causes someone or something to act. It can refer to an external force such as government policy or economic pressure, or it can refer to an internal force such as ambition or motivation. It is frequently used to explain why people do what they do or why certain trends or events occur.
Therefore the option<u> B. Motive </u>is the correct answer.
To know more about Motive,
brainly.com/question/943563
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answer is D: More police officers are killed by firearms than preschoolers
Explanation:
In normal sense, we see that the number of deaths of preschoolers resulting from firearms is greatly on the increase. We have experienced tragic gun shooting in schools and there is no way that the number of police officers killed by firearms would surpass this. Hence, according to the text, the false statement is to say that more police officers are killed than preschoolers, by firearm.
