Answer:
Indo-European
Explanation:
Indo-European Language is the family of languages that by 1000 BC were spoken throughout Europe and in parts of southwestern and southern Asia. Isogloss was known as the geographical boundary of a certain linguistic feature, such as the pronounciation of a vowel, the meaning of a word, or the use of some syntactic feature.
Hope this Helps!
I personally hold no judgement but <span>If you go on YouTube 99% of the material about Brazil is made by Brazilians. Brazil occupies less space in US news than any country in the MIddle East or most of Asia. Recently Americans have been exposed to Brazilians who moved here or are college students. Brazilian tourism to the US is much greater than US tourism to Brazil, and 90% of the American tourist I have encountered in Brazil were on their way to Buenos Aires or Iguazu Falls or some other Latin American destination.</span>
Based on the question above, I have provided the missing
information to completely answer the question.
The correct answer is that the events “male” and “bet on professional sports”
are not mutually exclusive, so it is a no. The reason to this is because a
person can exist as both male and bet on the professional sports. The correct
answer is letter c.
Answer:
Elections affect the Supreme Court like this:
When a president is elected in the US, they are most likely to be of one political party or another. The president also appoints a Supreme Court Justice. If a president is considering appointing a judge, they will probably appoint someone who shares their views, so as to sway matters that get taken to the Supreme Court in their favor.
Explanation:
Example, because I'm not sure I explained correctly: If a president is more left-leaning, they can (and probably will) appoint a left-leaning judge, so that they will judge matters as they or their political party would judge them. Appointing a judge with whom you disagree with isn't a strategic idea, because the president's ideals may be very different from a right-leaning judge. t-leaning, they can (and probably will) appoint a left-leaning judge, so that they will judge matters as they or their political party would judge them. Appointing a judge with whom you disagree isn't a strategic idea, because the president's ideals may be very different from a right-leaning judge.
