Based on the amount budgeted and the cost of sight seeing, kari has almost exactly enough left in her budget to see genoa.
<h3>Which city should Kari see?</h3>
Exchange rate is the rate at which one currency is exchanged for another currency. In ths question, 1 dollar is exchange for 0.6859 euros.
- The first step is to convert the amount budgeted to Euros: 585 x 0.6859 = 401.25
- Cost in Euro of seeing Naples : 0.6859 x 71.06 = £48.74
- Cost in Euro of seeing Venice : 0.6859 x 113.38 = £77.77
- Total cost of the sightseeing = £48.74 + £77.77 + £68.77+ £95.41 + £49.69 + £60.85 = £401.25
To learn more about exchange rate, please check: brainly.com/question/13717814
#SPJ4
The best ground on which the defendant ( Company S ) can dismiss the suit filed by the plaintiff (Company T) is the standing to sue.
<h3>What is standing to sue?</h3>
Standing to sue refers to a situation where the plaintiff who has filed the case must prove with appropriate proof of having damages or injuries in respect of the conduct of the defendant.
In the provided case, Company T has to prove that the products of Company S are actually defective through appropriate evidence. If Company T can't able to prove their alleged claim before the court, then the case is decided in the favor of the defendant party, that is, Company S.
Therefore, the standing to sue can be used as a ground by Company S for dismissing the claim of Company T.
Learn more about the standing to sue in the related link:
brainly.com/question/14820416
#SPJ4
Answer:
Objective Theory
Explanation:
The Objective theory states that the intent to form a contract will be judged by outward objective facts such as the words and actions of the party instead of the secret, subjective intentions. This theory replaced the Subjective theory in the late nineteenth century. The former theory was of the opinion that the meeting of minds, which translates to the unexpressed intentions of the party would form a basis for interpreting the intent to form a contract.
The objective theory is important as it advocates freedom to a fair hearing, freedom of contract, and personal independence or sovereignty.
The correct option is (b) Protective tariffs
Protective tariffs aim to make imported goods more expensive while protecting domestic producers from overseas rivalry.
<h3 /><h3>What is protective tarrifs?</h3>
- An illustration of a protective tariff would be the US raising the customs charge on clothing imported from Britain so that it is significantly more expensive than clothing made domestically.
- The importing countries profit the most from tariffs since they design the policy and receive the cash.
- The main advantage of tariffs is that they generate income from imported products and services. Tariffs may also serve as a springboard for negotiations between two countries.
- Protective tariffs are designed to shield vital American industries from international competition, stop foreign manufacturers from dumping inexpensive goods in the US, or both.
Learn more about the Tarrifs with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/11672570
#SPJ4
I understand that the question you are looking for is "Which of these actions was an economic cause of increased tensions between the North and South?
(a) Dred Scott decision
(b) Protective tariffs
(c) Bleeding Kansas
(d) Lincoln’s election"
