Answer:
If General James Longstreet had commanded the Confederate forces at Gettysburg instead of Lee the Confederacy might very well have won the Civil War.
The outcome of a Confederate victory would have been the break up of the United States but not quite as President Jeff Davis wanted. The Confederacy was never a country, which is obvious from its name. The Southern states were allied by expediency but were as disparate among each other as they were with the North. It is difficult to see how they would have formed an alternative long term Confederate States.
The Confederacy could not have occupied the North and had no intention to do so. The invasion of the North by the Army of Northern Virginia was tactical, not strategic and the Southern Government's intention was to sue for peace based on a rather naive idea that capturing Washington would have ended the war.
If they had captured Lincoln and his government that might have happened, more likely though they would have decamped to another major Northern city before the Army of Northern Virginia got there.
Great question, I was looking forward to a debate on the Civil War!
Explanation:
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Only anarcho-capitalists believe that defense should be provided by private firms.
A more general approach is that there are primary and secondary functions in the state.
Primary functions are defense, legislation, judiciary, and so on. Basically this means that the state should provide public goods
Secondary functions might include non-public goods such as education, health, energy and so on.
A good rule of thumb is that when economist say "small" goverment they mean that it should only take care of it's primary functions
The main areas of open-field<span> farming stretched from Dorset and Hampshire in the south, through the midlands, to Yorkshire and Norfolk in the east. </span>Advantages<span> The </span>system<span> had many social </span>advantages<span>. Its small scattered strips </span>were<span> theoretically intended to share good and bad land fairly.</span>
Hi there!
From what what this question is saying it sounds like that the Americans being used as "insurance policies to guarantee the safe delivery of munitions" must mean that the Americans were to insure safe transport of the munitions of war from location to location. So, Senator Norris must mean that the munitions of war are guaranteed safe transport by American citizens used as insurance policies.
<em>Hope this helps!</em>
<em>-WolfieWolfFromSketch</em>
