Answer:
All of them. :)
Explanation:
Or, the household controls all factors of production, which are land, labor and capital. :)
Answer: One significant distinction among Kush and Egypt is their areas. Kush was a domain toward the south of Egypt and was worked at the base of the mountains. They had a consistent measure of precipitation. This precipitation combined with the spillover from the mountains implied that they quite often had fruitful soil. This was an alternate story for Egypt. Egypt relied upon the yearly flooding of the Nile River so as to have great soil to plant and develop food required for endurance. This flooding was indispensable to their progress. Another contrast among Kush and Egypt is that sovereigns governed Kush, not at all like the male lords and pharaohs that controlled Egypt. They additionally fabricated burial chambers like the Egyptians did however the Kush by and large constructed burial chambers with level rooftops on them. Kush likewise had regular assets, for example, gold, ivory, and iron metal. Preservation is likewise a region where they had a few contrasts. The cycle of embalmment in Egypt was frequently held for those with abundance on the grounds that the cycle was costly and the average citizens couldn't manage the cost of it. Kush aristocrats likewise embalmed their dead however the ordinary citizens preserved their dead also.
Explanation:
"...it is appropriate to centralize authority."
Centralized authority is the right to command immediate subordinates. This exist in an organizational management structure, where all of the decisions and orders come from the top levels of the organization. The top level is the one who coordinates, monitors, and assesses the activities needed to accomplish certain tasks.
Answer: <em>Option (D) is correct.</em>
According to neoclassical assumptions, state policies should mainly focus on long-term growth and controlling inflation.
Neoclassical economics viewpoint focuses on the measurement of commodities, their outputs, and distributions of income in industry or markets through the forces of demand and supply. It is a theory which predominately concentrates on the efficacy of commodities and how it affects forces of demand and supply.
Answer: The correct answer is Missouri & Kentucky
Explanation: