2.875 would be the answer but if you need a whole number round up to 3
Answer:
yes I think so
Step-by-step explanation:
hope this helps sorry if i messed up
I don't knowwwwwwww jdjdidksosososoisjsjdjdjd
Answer: D
Step-by-step explanation: because I said so
The problem is that ∃xp(x) is true, and <span>∃xq(x) is true means that for some x=x1, p(x) is true, and for some x=x2, q(x) is true. There is no guarantee that x1=x2, although it is not impossible.
However, </span><span>∃x(p(x) ∧ q(x)) means that for the same x=x0, p(x0) is true, and q(x0) is true. This cannot be implied from the first proposition, therefore
</span>
<span>∃xp(x) ∧ ∃xq(x) => ∃x(p(x) ∧ q(x)) is a false statement.</span>