The failure of United States in the invasion of the bay of pigs in 1961 was a big diplomatic embarrassment for the administration of John F. Kennedy. The aftermath of the failed mission was the fear of the Americans about their neighbor nation.The United States reduced any products and trades coming from Cuba.
<u><em>Answer:</em></u>
Change the texture of their scales
<u><em>Explanation:</em></u>
Species with this characteristic are capable of changing the texture to fool predators, not attract mates
If the price of a product is higher than the equilibrium, there will be a surplus.
Option: A
Explanation:
Market equilibrium is reached when demand and supply curve intersect means there is an equal balance between demand and supply of the product in market. When the price of a product is higher than the equilibrium there will be a surplus of the product.
When producer produced enough product in comparison with demand what will happen? Producer will obviously sell his product in lower prices to make his stock clear. And when he lowers the price of product it will create huge demand means surplus of the product in the market.
Answer:
The use of the term "ethical" sometimes is a bit too lax when applied to evaluate situations. However, sometimes, it can also be too harsh. In response to your two questions, these would be the answers:
1. The ethical question here would be whether Greedy was right in overusing a benefit that the charitable organization had with the First California Bank. As President of the organization, it is in the hands of Greedy to ensure not just development, but also sustainable development of the organization. However, in the course of his attempts to improve the growth and efficacy of Send Me Money, he abused the benefit of the overdraft, and not to just any extent, but to the negative balance of 10.000 dollars. Although his intentions were in favor of the organization, and he used the money wisely, there still lies the question of if he could not have accomplished just as much, without abusing a benefit that could very well mean the end of the organization. So the ethical issue is that although the intention of Greedy was in the benefit of the organization, he did not take the best interest of it into account, because if he had, he would have tried to accomplish his goals without bringing the debt so high.
2. I disapprove of the way that Bill Greedy acted because he could have accomplished much more realistic goals and not placed the organization at risk by raising the debt to a bank to such high levels. Even if he increased fundraising efforts, it is evident that these were not successful, as the debt is so high.
