Answer:
$22,500
Explanation:
Data given in the question
Purchase value of the patent = $175,000
Legal fees = $5,000
The Remaining life of the patent = 13 years
Expected using life of the patent = 8 years
So by considering the above information, the annual amortization expense for 2019 is
= (Purchase value of the patent + Legal fees incurred) ÷ (Expected using life of the patent)
= ($175,000 + $5,000) ÷ (8 years)
= $22,500
Answer:
It ensures that the Effective internal control reduces the risk of asset loss, and helps ensure that plan information is complete and accurate, financial statements are reliable, and the plan's operations are conducted in accordance with the provisions of applicable laws and regulations. ... Why internal control is important to your plan.
According to <em>Robin Leidner</em>, fast-food restaurants rationalize the process of providing food to customers by developing standardized scripts for employees to use when dealing with customers.
There are many advantages associated with the fact that fast-food chains develop standardized scripts for customer service, as this way, they ensure compliance and quality of processes.
Standardization in fast-food restaurants therefore ensures faster service, mechanization of processes and higher quality in food production, since production and service standards must be followed in any unit of a fast-food chain.
Learn more about standardization here:
brainly.com/question/8189591
Answer: c. a decision-making entity at a firm involved in a strategic game
Explanation:
In a theoretical game, there are two players that have to embark on different strategies such that they make the maximum payoff. This maximum payoff strategy is known as the dominant strategy.
These two players are the decision making entities in the firms that are competing in the game because they are the ones that decide how the firm should react and what strategy to use. For instance, the owners of the two bakeries down the street are the players because they control what either bakery will do.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Usually distributions reduce a partner's outside basis in a partnership, they are generally not considered income. Since most distributions are not considered income, they do not result in gains for the partner. Some distributions may result in gains, such as certain cash distributions or securities (bonds) distributions. It is uncommon for a gain to result from property being distributed.
