Identify the supply chain management process that produces, tests, packages, and prepares products for delivery.

When janice went to work as a hair stylist in rick's beauty shop, she entered into an agreement with rick whereby if she left sh

ASHA 777 [7]

The question is incomplete, here is the complete question which I previously came across;

When Janice went to work as a hair stylist in Rick's beauty shop, she entered into an agreement with Rick, whereby, if she left she would not work for another beauty shop within 50 miles for 2 years. Rick trained Janice in a number of new techniques. After nine months, Janice was offered a great job down the street at a new beauty shop, quit Rick, and had a number of customers follow her down the street to her new job. Rick claimed that she had signed a contract and had no right to go to work at the new shop. Janice disagreed and told Rick that no judge in the country would enforce such an agreement. Janice told Rick that she was more worried about a customer, Treena, who was threatening to sue her because her hair turned green after Janice worked on it. Janice agreed that Treena's hair was damaged. Janice pointed out, however, that she told Treena that odd results could result from a dye attempt, and she required that Treena sign a contract releasing Janice from all liabilities before she did anything with Treena's hair. Treena, however, sued anyway. The agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as?

The answer is, the agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as "covenant not to compete".

It is hard to decide if a judge will implement a non-competition agreement. While the privileged insights of a business are important, the law additionally puts value to a person's opportunity to seek after other work. To be enforceable Courts more often than not require that a contract not to compete be sensible. In California, non-competes are adequately unlawful except if you are selling a business. Different states will implement a few provisions, as a rule the trade secret protection, however not the work limitations.

3 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is NOT part of value-chain analysis? (a) product research (b) quality management (c) supply chain managem

andriy [413]

Answer:

c? , supply chain management

7 0

2 years ago

What determines the value of an item?

galina1969 [7]

The value of item is determined by its utility to the person who is purchasing it. If an item has high utility, then consumers are willing to pay more and will value the product more. If an item has low utility, it will not be very valuable to the person. People value items differently. the old saying that one's man's trash is another's treasure holds true here.

7 0

3 years ago

Iaci Company makes two products from a common input. Joint processing costs up to the split-off point total $42,000 a year. The

eimsori [14]

Questions

Iaci Company makes two products from a common input. Joint processing costs up to the split-off point total $42,000 a year. The company allocates these costs to the joint products on the basis of their total sales values at the split-off point. Each product may be sold at the split-off point or processed further. Data concerning these products appear below: Product X Product Y Total Allocated joint processing costs $22,400 $19,600 $42,000 Sales value at split-off point $32,000 $28,000 $60,000 Costs of further processing $11,600 $25,300 $36,900 Sales value after further processing $44,800 $53,200 $98,000 Required: (a) What is the net monetary advantage (disadvantage) of processing Product X beyond the split-off point?

Answer:

Net advantage from further processing $1,200 

Explanation:

A company should process further a product if the additional revenue from the split-off point is greater than than the further processing cost.

Also note that all the joint costs incurred up to the split-off point are irrelevant to the decision to process further any of the .

Net monetary advantage of product X

$

Sales revenue after the split-off point 44,800

Sales revenue at the split-off point (32,000)

Additional sales revenue 12,800

Further processing cost (11,600)

Net advantage from further processing 1,200

Net advantage from further processing $1,200 

4 0

3 years ago

A property is projected to generate cash flows of $10,000, $12,000, $15,000, and $17,000 at the end of year 1, 2, 3, and 4, resp

aliina [53]

Answer:

Total present value= $100,401.36

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

A property is projected to generate cash flows of $10,000, $12,000, $15,000, and $17,000 at the end of year 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The expected sale price for the property at the end of year 4 is $100,000.

We need to apply the following formula to each cash flow:

PV= FV/(1+i)^n

Cf1= 10,000/1.13= 8,849.56

Cf2= 12,000/1.13^2= 9,397.76

Cf3= 15,000/1.13^3= 10,395.75

Cf4= (17,000 + 100,000)/1.13^4= 71,758.29

Total= $100,401.36

3 0

3 years ago