1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stellarik [79]
3 years ago
5

Samantha is employed full-time and earn 6900per month . what is her equivalent weekly salary

Mathematics
1 answer:
AysviL [449]3 years ago
5 0
6900 divided by 4
=$ 1,725 is her equivalent weekly salary

You might be interested in
Simplify the expression 2(10) + 2(x - 4)
choli [55]

Answer:

2(x+6)

Step-by-step explanation

5 0
3 years ago
Look at the number 4,444. How is the value of the 4 changing as it moves one place to the left
kakasveta [241]

Answer:

its going up by 10

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Nine bean plants were grown in varying amounts of light. Mark thinks that, if the light is too intense, a bean plant will not gr
krek1111 [17]

Answer: C) Yes, when the light was too strong the plants did not grow well

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
How to do the inverse of a 3x3 matrix gaussian elimination.
nata0808 [166]

As an example, let's invert the matrix

\begin{bmatrix}-3&2&1\\2&1&1\\1&1&1\end{bmatrix}

We construct the augmented matrix,

\left[ \begin{array}{ccc|ccc} -3 & 2 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 2 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{array} \right]

On this augmented matrix, we perform row operations in such a way as to transform the matrix on the left side into the identity matrix, and the matrix on the right will be the inverse that we want to find.

Now we can carry out Gaussian elimination.

• Eliminate the column 1 entry in row 2.

Combine 2 times row 1 with 3 times row 2 :

2 (-3, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0) + 3 (2, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0)

= (-6, 4, 2, 2, 0, 0) + (6, 3, 3, 0, 3, 0)

= (0, 7, 5, 2, 3, 0)

which changes the augmented matrix to

\left[ \begin{array}{ccc|ccc} -3 & 2 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 7 & 5 & 2 & 3 & 0 \\ 1 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{array} \right]

• Eliminate the column 1 entry in row 3.

Using the new aug. matrix, combine row 1 and 3 times row 3 :

(-3, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0) + 3 (1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1)

= (-3, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0) + (3, 3, 3, 0, 0, 3)

= (0, 5, 4, 1, 0, 3)

\left[ \begin{array}{ccc|ccc} -3 & 2 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 7 & 5 & 2 & 3 & 0 \\ 0 & 5 & 4 & 1 & 0 & 3 \end{array} \right]

• Eliminate the column 2 entry in row 3.

Combine -5 times row 2 and 7 times row 3 :

-5 (0, 7, 5, 2, 3, 0) + 7 (0, 5, 4, 1, 0, 3)

= (0, -35, -25, -10, -15, 0) + (0, 35, 28, 7, 0, 21)

= (0, 0, 3, -3, -15, 21)

\left[ \begin{array}{ccc|ccc} -3 & 2 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 7 & 5 & 2 & 3 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 3 & -3 & -15 & 21 \end{array} \right]

• Multiply row 3 by 1/3 :

\left[ \begin{array}{ccc|ccc} -3 & 2 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 7 & 5 & 2 & 3 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & -1 & -5 & 7 \end{array} \right]

• Eliminate the column 3 entry in row 2.

Combine row 2 and -5 times row 3 :

(0, 7, 5, 2, 3, 0) - 5 (0, 0, 1, -1, -5, 7)

= (0, 7, 5, 2, 3, 0) + (0, 0, -5, 5, 25, -35)

= (0, 7, 0, 7, 28, -35)

\left[ \begin{array}{ccc|ccc} -3 & 2 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 7 & 0 & 7 & 28 & -35 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & -1 & -5 & 7 \end{array} \right]

• Multiply row 2 by 1/7 :

\left[ \begin{array}{ccc|ccc} -3 & 2 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 4 & -5 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & -1 & -5 & 7 \end{array} \right]

• Eliminate the column 2 and 3 entries in row 1.

Combine row 1, -2 times row 2, and -1 times row 3 :

(-3, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0) - 2 (0, 1, 0, 1, 4, -5) - (0, 0, 1, -1, -5, 7)

= (-3, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0) + (0, -2, 0, -2, -8, 10) + (0, 0, -1, 1, 5, -7)

= (-3, 0, 0, 0, -3, 3)

\left[ \begin{array}{ccc|ccc} -3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & -3 & 3 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 4 & -5 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & -1 & -5 & 7 \end{array} \right]

• Multiply row 1 by -1/3 :

\left[ \begin{array}{ccc|ccc} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & -1 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 4 & -5 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & -1 & -5 & 7 \end{array} \right]

So, the inverse of our matrix is

\begin{bmatrix}-3&2&1\\2&1&1\\1&1&1\end{bmatrix}^{-1} = \begin{bmatrix}0&1&-1\\1&4&-5\\-1&-5&7\end{bmatrix}

6 0
2 years ago
What is the inverse of the following statement? If m is the midpoint of PQ, then PM is congruent to QM
stepan [7]

The inverse of the statement is M be the point on PQ since PM is congruent to QM than M is midpoint on the PQ.

<h3>What do you mean by inverse?</h3>

Inverse of the statement means that explain the condition in reverse way or vice versa.

Since, M is the midpoint of PQ, then PM is congruent to QM.
Proving in reverse way, let m be the point between P and Q the distance M from P is equal to the distance from M to Q. Which implies that M lies as the mid of the P and Q.

Thus, the inverse of the statement is M be the point on PQ since PM is congruent to QM than M is midpoint on the PQ.

Learn more about inverse here:
brainly.com/question/5338106


#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • A cube has a lateral area of 9 square centimeters. What is the length of each edge of the cube?
    13·2 answers
  • What is the final cost of an item that is priced at $22.35 with a sales tax rate of 6%?
    10·1 answer
  • 1\(x^2-2x-3=6/x+4 solve problem with steps
    12·1 answer
  • What is the area of this trapezoid?
    12·2 answers
  • Suppose the effort arm is longer and the end of the effort arm is 1.5 m off the ground.. Will Dan use more or less effort force
    9·1 answer
  • Somebody help me fast<br> This is correct?!
    9·1 answer
  • Pls help me you don't need to explain. ❤️❤️❤️
    5·2 answers
  • Pablo swims 1 length of a swimming pool. What unit would be best for measuring that length of the pool?
    7·1 answer
  • 4. Transversal E F intersects AB and CD, as shown in
    6·2 answers
  • A tourist at scenic Point Loma, California uses a telescope to track a boat approaching the shore. If the boat moves at a rate o
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!