Modern psychology turned away from behaviorism in its classic because failed to consider the mental processes underlying cognition, option D as explained below.
<h3>What is behaviorism?</h3>
Behaviorism is a branch of psychology that does not take the subjective into consideration. People are regarded as sets of behaviors, all of which are learned through positive or negative reinforcement (rewards and punishments). Therefore, any other reasons for someone to behave in a certain way are not considered in behaviorism.
That is why modern psychology turned away from classic behaviorism. Since it failed to consider the mental processes underlying cognition, behaviorism isnow regarded as too limited an approach
With the information above in mind, we can conclude that option D is the correct answer for this question.
The complete question with the missing answer choices is the following:
Modern psychology turned away from behaviorism in its classic form for many reasons, including the fact that
- humans are more similar to computers than to other species studied in the laboratory.
- psychology rejected behaviorism's emphasis on an organism's subjective states.
- an organism's behavior can be changed by learning.
- classical behaviorism failed to consider the mental processes underlying cognition.
Learn more about behaviorism here:
brainly.com/question/14272121
#SPJ1
The executive budget officer
Nonverbal communication is similar to verbal communication in four respects: it is symbolic, it is<span>rule-guided, it may be intentional or unintentional, and it reflects culture. Hope this helps</span>
Citizens work together
We have jobs,cars
We are human..?
Idk what else that was hard
Answer:
Explanation:
If i remember correctly....
The Americans had gotten some information about the British wanting to take the hills for a tactical advantage. Of course I think both sides knew the advantage the other side would have if they had control of the hills. They were sent to Bunker Hill and made a mistake and ended up on Breeds hill, closer to where the British were positioned.
Anyways, I think it was more of Americans had to beat the British to it so the British didn't have the upper hand and the British had to take down the Americans, thinking they were going to shoot canons off the hill towards their troops and ships.
Hope this helps a little bit!