Structure is meant to keep the government in line. Depending on the different types of government, the structure will be different as well.
Answer:
Focus group
Explanation:
Focus group:
It is a group in which selected people participated and discuss the intended perception of the consumer on a particular or specific topic without any threatening environment with a positive response. Focus groups are collective together on a specific purpose. This group allows getting the information from the alternatives ways from the consumers without any survey study. A focus group can be conducted in the research study in which participants vary but the area is constant. The focus group's main purpose is to identify the feelings, emotions, perception and thought of a customer about a specific product, item, and solution.
The study is an experiment in light of the fact that the scientists control one variable to decide the impact on another.
An experiment is an investigation intended to contrast advantages of an intervention and standard medications, or no treatment, for example, another medication treatment or aversion program, or to indicate circumstances and end results. This sort of study is performed tentatively. Subjects are chosen from an examination populace, doled out to the different investigation gatherings, and observed after some time to decide the results that happen and are created by the new medication treatment, treatment, or intercession.
Answer:
(B). collect government taxes
Explanation:
A Bank is a financial institution that helps with the management of money, gives out loans, and gets profits in return. Banks only provide a means through which taxes are paid by opening an account for the government. Banks help people save their money, issue credit cards, store money in a safe place, etc. It is the function of the tax revenue service hired by the government to perform this duty. Hence, it is not within the banks' jurisdiction to collect taxes.
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The given statement asserts a true claim as it proposes a reasonable claim that it is essential to question the person individually to know their intentions or person's feelings before alleging a question on their ethics or considering their actions to be unethical. Such an action might be the consequence of a situation or circumstantial reaction, etc. Therefore, knowing the intentions becomes a must prior to any allegation to one's ethics. Hence, the statement is <u>true.</u>
