More often than not it is very hard to make decisions about economic development and the environment and manage to balance them so that both of them are in the desired position. The problem is that almost always the economic development depends on destroying parts of the environment, so often the choice is to either to stagnate on an economical basis and protect the environment, or push for economic development and destroy parts of the environment. This is very often a conflict situation, and in the last decades with the bigger awareness about the nature it is becoming even harder a decision to be made.
Hey ／人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人＼
The Best Answer Negative
GLAD TO HELP!!!
~~~ ╔͎═͓═͙╗
<span>~~~ ╚̨̈́═̈́﴾ ̥̂˖̫˖̥ ̂ )
</span>
If you get it WRONG i'm SORRY <span>¯\_(ツ)_/¯</span>
Answer:
Athletes - Legacy students.
Explanation:
What is analyzed in this study are the preferences for different types of applicant exercised by elite universities. As the study gathered, athletes are four times more likely that other students to gain admission whereas legacy students were just three times more likely to be admitted.
The result of the study described how elite universities gave added weight in admission decisions to applicants who have high SAT scores (above 1500), are African American, or are recruited athletes. There was also preference to Hispanic students as well as children of former students. It explains how those elite colleges extend preferences to many types of students and how this is controversial.
