Research are likely to suggest that competitive encounters are likely to be more hard working while the collaborative encounters are the ones who will likely give their time to cooperate. It is because competitive encounters are usually competitive in a way of reaching their tasks or goals while the collaborative encounters are likely to just cooperate because of their knowledge with the given task.
The answer is: " 8 (eight) " .
______________________________________________________
Every style can be chosen as per the comfort of the person. Finding a solution that will entirely satisfy all parties involved is part of collaborating. As you might say, a win-win scenario.
About win-win scenario
A win-win game, also known as a win-win scenario, is a unique case of the non-zero-sum game which results in a result that benefits two or more participants equally. A lose-lose scenario results by default if a win-win scenario is not realised because everyone loses if the business venture fails. In game theory, a win-win situation, also known as the win-win game or non-zero-sum game, is one in which all participants gain via collaboration, compromise, or collective engagement.
To know more about win-win scenario:
brainly.com/question/7189412
#SPJ4
Answer:
An experiment to test whether drinking alcohol influences people's tendency to become socially aggressive is written below in complete detail.
Explanation:
Experimental hypothesis:
In this research, if teenagers between 16 to 19, absorb 100% agave tequila, then they convert socially aggressive.
Dependent variable: social aggressiveness.
Autonomous variable: 100% agave tequila consumption.
the research group became aggressive after absorbing 100% agave tequila and finished up arguing with each other at each party.
Answer: FALSE
Explanation: The garden of Eden style of thinking is mythological style of thinking: people who believes that things not seen and has no prove of trace, has actually existed.
For someone to be skeptical means the person doesn't accept information easily, such person will always want to verify the information by asking more questions, so he can understand how the information is interrelated with the fact known.
This means that if a person rejects the mythological view of the garden of Eden, it is not certain that such person is highly skeptical, because such person may accept the mythological view of the existence of heaven and hell. Such person may only be skeptical about one thing and may not be skeptical about another thing, this means the person is not highly skeptical.
