Answer:
1. b. $896.00
2. c. $317.20
3. a. $578.80
4. b. $67.20
5. d. $4.80
Explanation:
1. WIlliam's total earnings
40 hours at $16 = $640
8 hours at $32 = $256
Total = $896
2. WIlliam's total deductions
Income Tax $200
United Fund deduction $50
Social security tax (6% * $896) $3.76
Medicare tax (1.5% * $896) <u>$13.44</u>
Total <u>$317.20</u>
3. William's net pay
= Total earnings - Total deductions
= $896 - $317.20
= $578.80
Cash Paid is $578.80
4. Employers FICA based on Williams pay
Social Security and Medicare taxes = 7.5% * $869 = $67.20
5. Employers Federal Unemployment based on Williams pay
Federal unemployment tax = 0.8% * $600 = $4.80
Answer:
The manager for what ever business there in should reach sufficient standards for the clients and to make clients feel good and there actually getting something good out of He/Hers Company.
Explanation:
Answer:
C. workers with more years of formal schooling are less likely to be affected by ability, effort, and chance.
Explanation:
The <em>signalling theory in education</em> tells us that employees send "signals" to their employees regarding their education. In other words, employers are willing to pay higher wages to employees with additional years of formal schooling.
This means these qualified workers have their wage primarily defined by their education level, which does not always reflect their true skill-set (the output of ability and effort).
Answer:
Franchise
Explanation:
This is a business arrangement where the owner of a successful business gives the right (through special business and legal arrangement) to another, to run such business in a specified location using his brand name in accordance with agreed terms and conditions. Under this arrangement, technical support and training are always provided by the franchiser.
The franchisor charges the franchisee a fee for the right which in most cases is periodic. The franchise is renewable.
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.
