Answer:
Distributor.
Explanation:
A distributor is a whole seller nominated by a company to most times exclusively redistribute the company products to all retailers and institutions in a designated territory.
A distribution may be required under three circumstances:
-for entering into a new town.
-for additional coverage in the same town.
-for replacing an existing distributor.
The expectations from the distributors must be defined right at the beginning so that the perspective candidates can be advised and secondly to get the right kind of distributors.
Answer:
The correct option is A
Explanation:
Mass marketing is the kind of market approach, in which the business or the firm decides to ignore or disregard the differences in the market segment and reconsider the full market with the one approach or the strategy, that supports the broadcasting idea, so that it will reach to the huge number of people.
This kind of marketing is the one which is a point of convergence on the newspapers, radio and television as the media used to approach the audience. So, it is engaging or involving in the mass marketing.
Answer:
Long term liabilities.
Explanation:
This can be easily or mostly be used in companies and also firms. In most cases they are been tagged a non-current liability.
They are generally defined to be obligations that are not been settled for/paid off in the current year or accounting period. Therefore, debts of this kind are not due within a year. Dept of this kind ranges from notes payable to bonds payable, also mortgages and are also seen as leases in a company settings.
In as much as this is not good for a company's financial health, investors and creditors see how the company is financed through this. Current obligations are seen to be more risky than non-current debts because they will need to be paid sooner.
Tomatoes are an input in the production of ketchup, and ketchup and mustard are substitutes. An increase in the price of tomatoes will LOWER the total surplus in the market for mustard
No,I don't think that the <span>government should be able to condemn property if what they plan to do is to sell it later for private use. This should apply to both the local and the national government. The government should only have the power to condemn property if some important need arises, such as security or infrastructure, and if the need is important for the functioning of a society. However, taking away someone's property to give it to someone else is not a good use of condemnation. </span>
