The correct answer is a concurring opinion.
Concurring opinions are written by Judges or Justices who agree with the outcome of the majority but who got there using different precedent, logic, legal reasoning.
The correct answer is the actor-observer bias.
The actor-observer bias (AOB) refers to the phenomenon where we attribute our own behavior to external factors beyond our personal control, while attributing others' behavior to factors internal to them, and fully within their control. In this instance, Tom believes that he is unable to stop gambling due to the negative influence of his friends (an external factor beyond his control), while believing that Barnaby is unable to stop gambling because he is addicted to it (a factor internal to Barnaby). Thus, Tom is demonstrating the actor-observer bias
Explanation:
bye have a great day ahead
<span>Accepting your coworkers for who they are could be called "tolerance", since it doesn't matter whether or not you believe or support them, it only matters that you respect them.</span>
I believe the answer is: <span>enough statistical support for the research hypothesis when there is not
In statistic terms, a type I error refers to the occurrence of "false positive" findings.
A false positive often happen when we do not have enough subjects which make us believe the data that we took from a small sample represent the true condition outside the research.</span><span />