1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DENIUS [597]
3 years ago
5

The 1950s were marked by great suspicion about advertisers and their potential persuasive powers. Do you see any lingering effec

ts of this era of paranoia in attitudes about advertising today?
Business
2 answers:
Basile [38]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Social contradictions can be utilized by promoting pictures and subjects since sponsors are attempting to help make a positive memory of the brand use. Promoting can place a positive memory into your head to determine the strains and logical inconsistencies.  

Advertising is a great deal of things. It's popularity based pop culture, capitalist tool, oppressor, liberator, art and theater, all folded into one. It's free speech, innovative flow and information assists business with getting things sold at it's good times.  

Publicizing is fun, and this book reflects it. Advertising is additionally business, and it's plainly passes on that message. Like different parts of business, advertising is the test and we comprehend that we get publicizing and advancement in its business and promotion settings.  

Publicizing and advancement for the sake of brands is a subject deserving of scholarly attention. The story of twentieth century was in no little part the narrative of the ascent of shopper and promoting culture. Many scholastic controls need to see how it works. We,as scholarly scientists are in a one of a kind and lucky position.  

The 1950s were set apart by extraordinary doubt about promoters and their potential convincing powers. Also, a wide scope of specialized apparatuses are presently talked about as supporters of the brand building process.

Mars2501 [29]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: Yes I do.

Explanation:

The 1950s were a time of great fear to people in the developed world. They feared that as the Cold War was just beginning, there were being watched by foreign powers and that they couldn't trust a lot of people because they didn't know who was who. Especially in America where the fear of Communism gripped the nation. They did not know if certain adverts were Communist Propaganda and they feared that sometimes the information government's had about them was used to Target them.

This fear is still quite evident today. Take the 2016 Election rumours for instance. Certain Social media platforms claimed that foreign powers used their sites to advertise the President and get him elected. The ease by which this was accepted showed that people do indeed still have fear advertising.

You might be interested in
If workers are more educated, then short-run aggregate supply ___________.
Yakvenalex [24]

Answer:

O will increase and output and price level will increase as well.

Explanation:

If workers are more educated, the productivity of the country will increase, increasing total output. As investment in training increases, so thus the workers' capacity to perform more efficiently. Also, when the demand for better (or more) trained workers increases, the salary level will also increase. As workers gain training and/or experience, their salaries increase, e.g. on average, a person with a college degree earns much more than someone with just a high school degree. This increase in the level of salaries will lead to an increase in the general price level.

5 0
2 years ago
James Sebenius, in his Harvard Business Review article: Six Habits of Merely Effective Negotiators, identifies six mistakes that
PolarNik [594]

Answer:

c. Neglecting the Other Side’s Problems.

Explanation:

To be an effective negotiator one must understand what his interest is and what he can compromise and the limits to what can be given to the other party (that is no-deal options).

It is even more important to understand the other parties problem. This can be used to guage their interest and how it can be met.

Not considering the counterparty problem is a mistake the negotiating team have made. If the other partie's problem is not understood then there won't be an effective way of negotiating.

3 0
3 years ago
Nolan is applying for a promotion within his company. the ________ state that the qualified candidate must have a four-year coll
balandron [24]

The correct answer is job specifications. Job specifications is being defined as a statement in regards of the essential components of the job class by which it includes the summary of the work that are to be performed, responsibilities, minimum qualifications, and as well as the primary duties.

3 0
3 years ago
Consider four different stocks, all of which have a required return of 15 percent and a most recent dividend of $4.20 per share.
natka813 [3]

Answer:

Dividend yield for W = 5%

Dividend yield for X = 15%

Dividend yield for Y = 20%

Dividend yield for Z = 4.6%

Explanation:

For a constant growth stock Price =\frac{D1}{r-g}

If r is made subject of formula;  r=\frac{D1}{Price}+g = div yield + growth rate

For Stock W, given r = 15% and g= 10%; dividend yield = 15%-10%=5%

For Stock X, given r = 15% and g= 0%; dividend yield = 15%-0%=15%

For Stock Y, given r = 15% and g= -5%; dividend yield = 15%-(-5)%=20%                                      

For Stock Z, the price of the stock today is calculated as follows:

Price of the stock today = \frac{D1}{(1+ke)^1}+\frac{D2}{(1+ke)^2}+\frac{P2}{(1+ke)^2}.

where P2= \frac{D3}{ke-g}

Price of the stock today = \frac{4.2(1.2)}{(1+0.15)^1}+\frac{4.2(1.2)^2}{(1+0.15)^2}+\frac{4.2(1.2)^2(1.1)}{(0.15-0.1)(1+0.15)^2}=109.57

Therefore dividend yield =\frac[D1}{Price} = \frac{4.2(1.2)}{109.57}=4.6%

5 0
3 years ago
Borghia Pharmaceuticals has $1 million allocated for capital expenditures. a. Which of the following projects should the company
balu736 [363]

Answer:

Please refer below the answer in detail

Explanation:

a)

With a limited budget, the firm will first pursue projects with the highest return, and the allocate the remaining capital to the project with the second highest return, and so on until all capital is fully allocated. Based on the information, Project 6 has the highest return, followed by 1 and 3. These three projects together will cost:

350,000 + 300,000 + 250,000 = $900,000

After those three projects, the firm will have $100,000 left. The best out of remaining project is 7, but it costs 400,000, which the firm cannot afford. The best affordable project is 4, which offers a return of 12.1%. Hence, the firm should spend the remaining 100,000 on project 4.

b)

The budget limit constraints the firm to give up project 7, which offers a NPV of $48,000. The firm is forced to choose project 4, which has a NPV of $14,000.

Thus the lost in market value of the firm = 48,000 - 14,000 = $34,000.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The property appraisal district for Marin County has just installed new software to track residential market values for property
    11·1 answer
  • What is foreign portfolio investment?
    14·2 answers
  • What is the main purpose of a sprint review?
    14·1 answer
  • James is dreading going to get his UF parking decal because he knows that the lines are usually three hours long. However, when
    10·1 answer
  • A firm achieves differentiation parity ideally when
    11·1 answer
  • Suppose the reserve requirement is 10%.
    5·1 answer
  • Why it’s difficult to find job?
    13·1 answer
  • You expect General Motors (GM) to have a beta of 1.5 over the next year and the beta of Exxon Mobil (XOM) to be 1.9 over the nex
    6·1 answer
  • 5 pose food risk or hazard
    5·2 answers
  • the true statement from the list below, regarding the Contribution Format Income statement. Multiple Choice The Contribution For
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!