Answer:
Needs, wants, and ability to purchas
Explanation:
There is no reason to focus on consumer needs thousands of years ago. But we can say that technological advances and communication are wreaking havoc in this regard. Trends and fashions mark each day more than we want to obtain, consume and buy. And that has multiplied by a thousand in the last hundred years
Answer:
Option b (reflects..................settled) is the right response.
Explanation:
- The estimated beneficiary obligation was indeed unwounded by that of the identification of inflation rates through an investment that raises something both PBO reserve as well as the retirement expenditure between each duration.
- The premium on either the expected advantage commitment portion including its pension cost illustrates the amounts beyond which the pension contributions will indeed be reasonably negotiated.
Any other option is not connected to that case. That's the right choice.
<span>20% is the maximum speed up possible for this program.
For this problem, let's assign the time of 1 for the task when using a single processor. Now let's assume that we have an infinite number of processors available to handle the portion of the program that can be executed in parallel so that the execution time for that portion will be 0. That means that the total execution time with an infinite number of processors will be
1 * (0.80 + 0) = 1 * 0.80 = 0.80
So at best, the parallel program will take 80% of the time for the single threaded version. So the speed increase will be
(1 - 0.80) / 1 = 0.20/1 = 0.20 = 20%</span>
Answer:
(g) Between 0 and -S7.5k because residents can substitute to other products
Explanation:
Data given in the question
Increase in price of typical soda = 10 cents
Total consumed = 150,000 sodas [er day
Dropped quantity = 75,000 sodas
So by considering the above information, the per day compensating variation of the tax varies from 0 and - 7,500
Since the sugar sweetened sodas is treated as a normal goods. Moreover, people can substitute the other goods also if there is an increase in a price of the good
The -7,500 is come from = (-75,000 × 0.10)
The options are as follows
(a) Greater than -$15k because soda is a luxury good with income (b) -$15k because that is the old consumption level times the value of the tax (c) Between -S7.5k and -$15k because soda is a luxury good elasticity > 1 with income elasticity >1 (d) Between -$7.5k arti -$15k because residents can substitute to other products (e) -$7.5k because that is the new consumption level times the value of the tax ()-$7.5k because that is the change in consumption times the value of the tax (g) Between 0 and -S7.5k because residents can substitute to other products (h) Between 0 and -$7.5k because because beverages are typically necessity goods with 6) Nothing because there was no effect on income G) It is impossible to say without knowing consumers' marginal rate of substitution income elasticity less than 1
