Answer:
1. $636
2. $674.16
3. $566.04
4. $534
Explanation:
PV = FV ÷ (1 + r/n)^(t × n)........(1)
PV = present value
FV = Future value
r = rate per period
t = number of years
n = number of compounded period per year
FV = P(1 + r/n)^(t×n)...............(2)
FV = Future value
P = principal
r = rate per period
n = number compounded period per year
t = number of year
NO 1.
P= $600
t = 1
n = 1
r = 6% = 0.06
Using equation 2
FV = 600(1 + 0.06/1)^(1 × 1) = $636
NO 2
P = $600
n = 1
t = 2
r = 0.06
Using equation 2
FV = 600(1 + 0.06/1)^(2 × 1) = $674.16
NO 3.
FV = $600
r = 0.06
t = 1
n = 1
Using equation 1
PV = 600 ÷ (1 + 0.06/1)^(1 × 1) = $566.04
NO 4.
FV = $600
r = 0.06
n = 1
t = 2
Using equation 1
PV = 600 ÷ (1 + 0.06/1)^(2 × 1) = $534
AD was a dark age and a period of cultural decay and decline for Europe because there was barely a government, harsh punishments, ignorant people, not a lot of land, and there was a lot of killing and diseases going around Europe that cause Europe to decline in population.
Answer:
The correct answer is a).
Explanation:
The income elasticity of demand refers to the percentual variation of quantity demanded of a certaing good in response to a percentual variation in income.
If the income elasticity of demand for medical care is 1.35,
<em>a. if income decreases by 1%, the quantity demanded for medical care decreases by 1.35%.</em> TRUE, this is what the definition implies.
<em>b. if the price of medical care increases by 1%, the quantity demanded for medical care decreases by 1.35%. </em>FALSE. In this elasticity, the sign is relevant. This income elasticity implies that changes in income and medical care expenses have the same sign.
<em>c. if the income of the average consumer increases by 1 dollar, the quantity demanded for medical care will increase by 1.35 units of care.</em> FALSE. The elasticity relates percentual variations, not absolute value variations.
<em>d. if income increases by 1%, the quantity demanded for medical care decreases by 1.35%.</em> FALSE. The same as point b.
Answer and Explanation:
There is no contract between Time's and Joshua, because it is not legally binding to each other and it has not been signed by either party. So not a single party is liable for the contract as the contract is unsigned and non-liable
Time has used it as a promotional means only for promoting magazine subscriptions.
Therefore, a case can not be built on letter-based basis.
