Which of the following factors least constrains high performance in planning organizations?

You purchase a twenty year zero coupon bond with a yield of 5%. One year later you sell the bond at a yield of 4%. What is your

astraxan [27]

Answer:

25.94%

Explanation:

Assume, Face value of bond =$1000

Purchase price of twenty year zero coupon bond = 1000/((1+i)^N) . Where, yield = 5% =0.05 , N= number of years to maturity =20

==> Purchase Price = 1000/(1.05^20)

Purchase Price = 1000/2.65329770514

Purchase Price = $376.89

Selling Price after one year: 1000/(1+I)^19. Where i=yield=4%=0.04, N=19

Selling Price=1000/(1.04^19)

Selling Price = 1000/2.10684917599

Selling Price = $474.64

Rate of Return = (474.64/376.89) - 1

Rate of Return = 1.25935949481281 - 1

Rate of Return = 0.2594

Rate of Return = 25.94%

7 0

3 years ago

What type of job can i get with a finance and marketing double major

lora16 [44]

You can get jobs such as social media manager, accountant, advertising manager, marketing analyst, marketing manager, financial planner, budget planner

6 0

3 years ago

Onslow Co. purchases a used machine for $178,000 cash on January 2 and readies it for use the next day at a $2,840 cost. On Janu

AVprozaik [17]

Answer:

Onslow Co.

Journal Entries:

1. Jan. 2: Debit Equipment $178,000

Credit Cash $178,000

To record the cash payment for equipment purchase.

2. Jan. 3: Debit Equipment $4,000

Credit Cash $4,000

To record the cash payment for readying the equipment for use.

3. Dec. 31: Debit Depreciation Expense $28,000

Credit Accumulated Depreciation $28,000

To record depreciation expense for the first year.

4. Dec. 31, Year 5: Debit Equipment Disposal$178,000

Credit Equipment $178,000

To transfer the equipment account to the Equipment Disposal account.

Debit Accumulated Depreciation $140,000

Credit Equipment Disposal $140,000

To transfer accumulated depreciation to the Equipment Disposal account.

a) Debit Cash $15,000

Credit Equipment Disposal $15,000

To record the cash proceeds from sale of equipment.

Debit Loss on Sale of Equipment $23,000

Credit Equipment Disposal $23,000

To record the loss on Equipment Disposal.

b) Debit Cash $50,000

Credit Equipment Disposal $50,000

To record the cash proceeds from sale of equipment.

Debit Sale of Equipment $12,000

Credit Gain on Sale of Equipment $12,000

To record the gain on Equipment Disposal.

c) Debit Cash $30,000

Credit Equipment Disposal $30,000

To record the cash proceeds from insurance company.

Debit Loss on Disposal $8,000

Credit Equipment Disposal $8,000

To record the loss on Equipment Disposal.

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

January 2: Cost of used machine = $178,000

January 3: Readying costs = $4,000 ($2,840 + $1,160)

Estimated useful life = 6 years

Estimated salvage value = $14,000

Depreciable amount = $168,000 ($182,000 - $14,000)

Depreciation method = straight-line method

Annual depreciation expense = $28,000 ($168,000/6)

Accumulated depreciation at December 31, Year 5 = $140,000 ($28,000*5)

Disposal date = December 31, Year 5

Journal Entries Analysis:

1. Jan. 2: Equipment $178,000 Cash $178,000

2. Jan. 3: Equipment $4,000 Cash $4,000

3. Dec. 31: Depreciation Expense $28,000 Accumulated Depreciation $28,000

4. Dec. 31, Year 5: Equipment Disposal $178,000 Equipment $178,000

Accumulated Depreciation $140,000 Equipment Disposal $140,000

a) Cash $15,000 Equipment Disposal $15,000

Loss on Sale of Equipment $23,000 Equipment Disposal $23,000

b) Cash $50,000 Equipment Disposal $50,000

Equipment Disposal $12,000 Gain on Sale of Equipment $12,000

c) Cash $30,000 Equipment Disposal $30,000

Loss on Disposal $8,000 Equipment Disposal $8,000

5 0

3 years ago

Today, you deposit $2,500 of cash in a savings account that earns 8.0% in annualized interest. One interest payment is received

Artemon [7]

Answer:

a. $173

Explanation:

The computation of the amount of interest earned in five years is shown below;

But before that following calculations need to be done

As we know that

Simple interest = Present value × rate of interest × time period

= $2,500 × 8% × 5

= $1,000

Now the future value is

Future value = Present value × (1 + rate of interest)^number of years

= $2,500 ×(1 + 8%)^5

= $2,500 × 1.4693280768

= $3,673

Now the compound interest is

Compound interest = Future value - Present value

= $3,673 - $2,500

= $1,173

Now interest on interest is

Interest on interest = Compound interest - Simple interest

= $1,173 - $1,000

= $173

3 0

3 years ago

You are a self-employed profit-maximizing consultant specializing in monoplies. Five single-price, profit-maximizing monopolies

inna [77]

Answer:

Firm A

Firm A is charging a cost of $3.90 for every unit. The normal expense is the all out cost separated by amount which ends up being $3.70 per unit. Presently its minor income is $3.00 per unit and negligible expense is $2.90 per unit. The imposing business model firm can't create enough yield in light of the fact that the minor income surpasses the minimal expense.

Consequently, Firm A is encouraged to expand its yield. This will bring increasingly net income and get it a higher benefit. The yield should increment till minimal income and negligible expense gets equivalent.

Firm B

Firm B is charging a cost of $5.90 for every unit. The normal expense is $4.74 per unit. Presently its peripheral expense is $5.90 per unit. Note that the syndication firm is charging a value which is equivalent to the negligible expense. Consequently, it is carrying on seriously. by delivering more and charging less.

Consequently, Firm An is encouraged to diminish its yield. This will expand cost more than the expansion in cost with the goal that it acquires a higher benefit. The yield should diminish till minimal income and minor expense gets equivalent.

Firm C

Firm C is charging a cost of $11.00 for every unit. The normal expense is the all out expense is $11.90 per unit. Minimal income is $9.00 per unit and minor expense is $9.00 per unit. The imposing business model firm is delivering a benefit expanding yield on the grounds that the minor income rises to the peripheral expense. Nonetheless, it is bearing misfortunes since normal expense is higher than cost.

Thus, Firm C is encouraged to stay at the present degree of yield. It can close down over the long haul if misfortunes keep on happening. This is on the grounds that it can't increment or diminishing its yield as it will just alumni the misfortunes.

Firm D

Firm D is charging a cost of $35.90 for every unit. The normal expense is additionally 35.90 per unit. The minor income is $37.90 per unit and negligible expense is $37.90 per unit. The imposing business model firm is creating a benefit amplifying yield on the grounds that the minor income approaches the peripheral expense. Strangely, its cost is not as much as its negligible income which is beyond the realm of imagination.

Thus, Firm D has fouled up estimations with respect to its cost. Thoughtfully, the cost ought to consistently be higher than the minimal income or at most extreme it tends to be equivalent to minor income. It ought to return and recalculate the cost.

Firm E

The information identified with the minor income and minimal expense for Firm E isn't given. The cost charged is $35.00 per unit. The normal expense is at its base level and is equivalent to $33.00 per unit. This data isn't adequate to distinguish if the firm is working at a benefit boosting level.

Therefore, Firm E is encouraged to stay at the present degree of yield.

6 0

3 years ago