Answer:
Option 4 is definitely correct: Whether real GDP increased cannot be determined with the information given.
Explanation:
The information that is given only states that there has been an increase in the market value of final goods and services in two years. So, we cannot conclude that production increased in Rushya or average price levels increased there as per Option A and C respectively, because market value can be increased by both increase in production or price levels. Even Option B cannot be concluded as the real GDP is dependent on other variables as compared to the total market value.
Thus, only appropriate statement is option D: we cannot determine increase in real GDP with the given information.
Answer:
This proposal will not work.
Explanation:
All taxes work the same way, it doesn't matter if they are payroll taxes or taxes on goods or services. In this case, labor is the service provided by the employees (suppliers) and the employer is the consumer. A tax increase will reduce the demand for labor, and therefore the equilibrium price of labor (wage) will also decrease. If wages decreases, then workers are not going to be better off, on the contrary they will be worse off. This tax increase will lower both the wage and the employment level.
Answer:
Following are the queries to these question:
Explanation:
Reporting entering for recording the note received
Permissible notes (face amount)........................................................ 
Cash................................................................................................... 
Answer:
a. Rp= 10.0hr
b. Tc= 1052 workers
c. n= 421 workstations
Explanation:
(a) Rp= Da/250Hsh. Rearranging, Hsh= Da/250Rp= 150,000/250(60) = 10.0 hr
(b) Tc= 60E/Rp= 60(0.95)/60 = 0.95 minTs= Tc– Tr= 0.95 – 0.10 = 0.85 minw= Min Int 14.0(60)/0.85(0.94) = 1051.3 rounded up to 1052 workers
(c) n= w/M= 1052/2.5 = 421 workstations
Under Price discrimination, an organization compares a few dimensions of its performance to that of another company, be it a competitor or in a totally distinctive industry.
Charge discrimination is a promoting method that fees clients one-of-a-kind charges for the same products or services based on what the seller thinks they can get the patron to comply with. In natural price discrimination, the vendor fees every customer the most fee they'll pay.
Charge discrimination refers to charging distinct clients special costs for the same true carrier. The Sherman Antitrust Act, Clayton Antitrust Act, and Robinson-Patman Act outlaw price discrimination while the intent of that discrimination is to harm competitors.
Price discrimination in a monopoly is a practice of charging extraordinary costs for an equal product. Monopolies generally have extra control over providers than ordinary sellers, which means that they can notably impact the providers' promoting prices.
Learn more about Price discrimination here: brainly.com/question/23342760
#SPJ4