False. The USA and Canada are high-income countries, but African colonies are still economically developing right now.
In <em>Mapp v. Ohio</em>, the Supreme Court ruled <u>B. If the police</u> violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.
<h3>What was the place of evidence in the case of Mapp v. Ohio?</h3>
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the state in a 5-3 vote, favoring Mapp, from whom evidence was obtained without due process.
The implication is that evidence seized unlawfully from a suspect or an accused, without a search warrant, could not be used in criminal prosecutions in state courts.
Thus, in <em>Mapp v. Ohio</em>, the Supreme Court ruled <u>B. If the police</u> violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.
Learn more about the importance of evidence in criminal prosecutions at brainly.com/question/7802791
#SPJ1
In the Federal Government thought, the Indian appropriations act would work as a peace plan avoiding a violent encounter between American white people and Indians once the Americans started to extend their lands to the western part of the country (The plains), this act let the Indian people to move to protected reserves through funds assigned by the government.
The fourteen points was a statement of principles for peace that was to be used for peace negotiation in order to end world war I
Ans-is C)
I hope it helps you ;)