Answer:
Compensatory Damages
Explanation:
Based on this scenario it can be said that Donald is entitled to Compensatory Damages. This is a lawsuit that covers the loss that the non-breaching party incurred as a result of the breach of contract. In this scenario, Donald's employer breached the contract by firing Donald before the twelve months. Therefore Donald can sue for compensatory damages which would be the amount of money that he would have made in the rest of the twelve months.
Answer:
The business judgement rule states that if the board takes decision in good faith and in best interest of the corporation considering the information available then its decision is not to be questioned by the courts. The courts can intervene only if there is any breach of good faith, due care or loyalty.
The above case is similar in facts with another case paramount vs time. In that case Time decided to merge with another company named Warner. Paramount also started bidding for Time but the directors of Time rejected their bid offer citing that warner merger would be more suitable for the company strategy.
Paramount then brought the case against Time in court.The court stated that the instant case was different from another case (REVLON VS MacAndrews) where Revlon was up for sale and hence it was necessary for the board to sell its assets to the highest bidder.
Answer:
The quantity is likely to decrease, the change in price depends on the extent of change in demand and supply.
Explanation:
The fear of the mad cow disease lead to a reduction in the demand for beef. This caused the demand curve to move to the left.
At the same time, destruction of cattle heads ordered by the government lead to a reduction in the supply of beef. This caused the supply curve to move to the left.
This leftward shift in both demand as well as supply curve will lead to a reduction in the equilibrium quantity of beef.
The change in price of beef depends upon the extent of change in demand and supply. If both decrease by the same extent, the price will remain the same.
Answer:
A larger industrial and service sector, and a larger number of people working outside of agriculture, can indicate a higher level of industrialization in the economy and vice versa. This means that the size of industrial service and the sector of agriculture employment rate indicates the level of industrialization because if the agriculture employment is higher than the industrial service it means that the country is not fully developed yet and therefore the level of industrialization is lower. But if the industrial service is higher than the agriculture employment that suggests or indicates that the country is developing or developed. For example in the United States the size of the industrial/service sector is much larger than it's agricultural employment and therefore this should suggest that country is much more industrialized or developed and the United States is. In comparison you take a developing country such as Chad and you can see that the agricultural employment is higher than the size of the industrial/service sector and in relation to this you can see that Chad must have a lower level of industrialization and in fact it does.
Explanation:
First let us identify if the asset is a gain
or loss. An asset is a gain if it contributes to the banks overall finance while
it is a loss if it is a cost directly or indirectly.
Deposits of $300 million = Gain (+)
Reserves of $20 million = Gain (+)
<span>Purchased government bonds worth $300 million
= Loss (-) ---> This entails
cost</span>
Selling bank’s loans at current market value
of $600 million = Gain (+)
Therefore adding up everything to get the banks net worth:
Stealth banks net worth = $300 M + $20 M - $300 M + $600 M
<span>Stealth banks net
worth = $620 million</span>
