1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KiRa [710]
4 years ago
13

Help me with english please!

English
1 answer:
alex41 [277]4 years ago
8 0

1. you don't need <em>the </em>in lake manitoba

2. don't need <em>the </em>in saudi arabia

3. don't need <em>the</em> before africa

4. don't need <em>the</em> before lisbon

5. no <em>the</em> before antarctica

srry for the misspellings.

You might be interested in
What does it mean when the broccoli is said to be bolting?
Harlamova29_29 [7]

Answer:

c it has stopped producing food

4 0
4 years ago
The author titled this section "Everything Tends to Ruin." What does the word tend mean in this context? Why did the author of t
mash [69]

Answer:

1. The word 'tend' means 'disposed to', or 'frequently leads to' destruction.

2. He chose this subtitle for this section to explain how difficult it was for the French people to control the Vietnamese people.

3. Ruined means destruction.

4. The Vietnamese people were doing the ruining.

Explanation:

The article, "The Vietnam Wars," highlights the resistance put up by the Vietnamese people when other nations like the Chinese and French tried to subjugate them. In that section, the phrase, "Everything Tends to Ruin", was used by a French Military commander to summarize the frustration of the French people who tried to colonize the Vietnamese people.

The locals used their knowledge of the terrains to cause mayhem to their colonists. They resisted the schooling offered by the French people and rather embraced their culture. All ploys by the French colonists to subjugate them were met with resistance.

3 0
3 years ago
Would Nietzsche agree with Macbeth’s means of ascending the throne?
Paul [167]

Answer:

As in all or almost all Shakespeare plays the opening scenes of Macbeth are key to setting up the problem the play addresses. In his Scottish play Shakespeare uses the opening scenes to set the two main contexts in which the regicide, usurpation, tyranny, and fall of the tyrant occur. The two are, we might say, the earthly or political context and the cosmic or superhuman context represented by the witches. In presenting these two contexts Shakespeare appears to be engaging in a dialogue with Machiavelli's Prince, taking cues from Machiavelli's political analysis on how to understand the political character of Scotland and taking issue with Machiavelli's ultimate agenda of a conquest of Fortuna.

Journal Information

The Review of Politics publishes primarily philosophical and historical studies of politics, especially those concentrating on political theory and American political thought. Thoughtful scholarly reflections on all aspects of politics - including analysis of institutions and techniques, analysis of literary reflections on politics, political interpretations of literary works, and constitutional theory and analysis - are also welcome. Some of the first essays advocating 'realism' were published in The Review, as well as articles from its opponents in international relations; both perspectives are accepted parts of the journal's coverage. Instructions for Contributors at Cambridge Journals Online

Explanation:

pleasss mark me as brainliest the answer.will u find if you read it carefully

#STAY SAFE

#BE CARE - FULL

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Using what you have learned from Jekyll and Hyde and from your own knowledge about modern-day science, explain if you feel there
KATRIN_1 [288]

Indian Journal of Psychiatry

Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

A study in dualism: The strange case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde

Shubh M. Singh and Subho Chakrabarti

Additional article information

Abstract

R. L. Stevenson's novel, The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is a prominent example of Victorian fiction. The names Jekyll and Hyde have become synonymous with multiple personality disorder. This article seeks to examine the novel from the view point of dualism as a system of philosophy and as a religious framework and also from the view point of Freud's structural theory of the mind.

Keywords: Dualism, literature, psychiatry

DUALISM

Dualism derives from the Latin word duo, meaning two. Simply put, dualism can be understood as a thought that facts about the world in general or of a particular class cannot be explained except by supposing ultimately the existence of two different, often opposite, and irreducible principles. Dualism is most often discussed in context of the systems of religion and philosophy.[1]

The purpose of this paper is to examine Robert Stevenson's famous novel, “The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde”[2] from the view point of the above mentioned systems and to discuss the novel from a psychological perspective.

THE AUTHOR AND THE NOVEL

Robert Balfour Louis Stevenson was a Scottish novelist, short story writer, and poet. Born in 1850, he was a qualified advocate but earned his living as a writer. He was chronically afflicted with tuberculosis, and dabbled with various psychotropic drugs such as alcohol, cannabis, and opium. He is well known for his dark and sinister tales like Markheim, Thrawn Janet, and racy adventure novels such as Treasure Island and Kidnapped. Successful and famous, he died at a young age in 1894. Interestingly enough, Stevenson later claimed that the plot of The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr. Hyde was revealed to him in a dream.[3]

The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde deals with a Dr. Henry Jekyll who is widely respected, successful, and possesses a brilliant intellect but is only too aware of the duplicity of the life that he leads, and of the evil that resides within him. Dr. Jekyll covertly provides utterance to the evil in his soul by various unspeakable acts, but is afraid of doing so openly because of the fear of social criticism. In the course of his experiments, he succeeds in producing a concoction that enables him to free this evil in him from the control of his good self, thus giving rise to Edward Hyde. Edward Hyde is pure evil and amoral. Not only is his psyche different from Dr. Jekyll but also his body is grotesque and deformed. Thus, Dr. Jekyll thinks that he can receive the pleasure that both parts of his being crave without each being encumbered by the demands of the other. However, Mr. Hyde evokes feelings of dread and abhorrence in Dr. Jekyll's friends who beseech him to give up his “friendship” with this Edward Hyde. Edward Hyde gradually becomes ever more powerful than his ‘good’ counterpart and ultimately leads Dr. Jekyll to his doom. “Jekyll and Hyde” as an eponymous term has become a synonym for multiple personality in scientific[4] and lay literature[5] and the novel has also been considered a case demonstration of substance dependence.[6]

DUALISM, RELIGION, AND THE NOVEL

A religion that is dualistic admits not only that the universe comprises good and evil, or light and darkness, but also that though these are eternally opposed they are coeternal, coexistent, and equipotent.[7] This is an important distinction from nondualistic, monistic religions where evil comes about as an accident during creation of the Universe or as a result of powerful beings that can be good or bad as per what serves them or injures them and not because they are evil for the sake of being evil. Here, the good and the evil are often derived from the same source or from one another, much like the Pandavas and Kauravas in the Mahabharata. Zoroastrianism is often cited as an example of a dualistic religion where the concentration of all that is good is around Ahura Mazda, and all that is evil around Ahra Mainyu. These two forces are at constant war and only at the end will good finally vanquish evil. Interestingly, Christianity, the religion Stevenson was born into, rejects dualism and preaches a monistic origin to the universe from one, infinite, and self-existing spiritual being who freely created everything. However, the dualism of the human soul and the body which it animates was made clearer and is emphasized by the church. In the same vein, Christianity holds that evil is the necessary limitation of finite created beings and is a consequence of creation of beings possessed by free will. As an imperfection inherent in the manufacturing process of individuals, evil is tolerated by God.[1]

7 0
3 years ago
Very simple question, please help:(
Gre4nikov [31]

Answer:

1.Their

2.Has

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which options best complete the sentences to give them a parallel structure. 1. Matt walked outside,blank opened the garage door
    5·2 answers
  • Is buffon negative positive or neutral
    12·1 answer
  • He walked slowly wnd deliberately into hostile territory
    14·1 answer
  • Read this excerpt from "A Letter from Birmingham Jail" by Martin Luther King Jr.:
    13·2 answers
  • PICKINy tile Right Synonym
    13·2 answers
  • Who invited the local native Americans to a meal with them?
    8·1 answer
  • It's no surprise that exercise increases energy. The physical challenge prepares your body in a variety of ways. Blood sugar is
    5·2 answers
  • 1.-My brother don't play / doesn't play basketball after school. 2.-My grandfather don't ride / doesn't read a bicycle. 3.-I don
    11·1 answer
  • In what ways can energy be transferred or transformed?
    10·1 answer
  • In the following sentence, what is the function of baseball and basketball?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!