The scenario that is explained is an example of necessity of compromise.
- Equality before the law means that everyone is equal and there should be no one who sees himself or herself to be superior to others. The same law is applicable to everyone.
- Majority rule implies that the political decisions should be made by the majority of the people in the group.
- Individual worth and dignity imply that people should be treated with respect.
- Necessity of compromise means that people can agree to a particular thing but understanding themselves in order to achieve a goal.
- In this case, in order to fund the construction of the new highway, the citizens agreed to a minimal increase in taxes.
In conclusion, the correct option is C
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/22268081
Neoliberalism supports laissez-faire economics. In other words, an economy in which their private parties can realize transactions between them without government intervention. It also supports free-market capitalism which beliefs in private ownership of entities and the operation of them in order to make a profit.
Adam Smith is the economist behind this ideology. In his book: "The Wealth of nations" he strongly criticized mercantilism, government subsidies, and the licensing of monopolies.
<em>Privatization programs go in line with this current of thought and have dominated world politics in the western hemisphere during a great part of the 20th century until nowadays.</em>
Islam spread to most of the Iberian Peninsula, and as far India in the east.
The answer to this question is b
Answer:
American revolution might bring ruin to Georgia because if Great Britain Wins the war the consequences on a political and economic or prospective would be catastrophically.
Explanation:
A Georgia loyalist would think in terms of consequence and counteraction when it comes to the American Revolution.
The United States where not born yet so there was no political structure to help States transitioning from England towards independence and there were no historical precedent for a movement of that type, so many people who were loyalist were Simply afraid of a situation that could turn out badly very fast.
they also take into consideration the possibility that Great Britain could win, which could have led the Empire to massive counteraction in order to prevent another Revolution.
Also many loyalists were Rich People so before they could have a lot of loss from this Revolution since their source of income was based on trade with Great Britain
