Answer:
You have mistreated me for too long George! I believe it is best that we go our seperate ways. All you have done is lie and cheat... Don't you understand what you put me through? Well i guess it does not matter now, because were done. Sorry it had to end this way George.
<em>Yes, it was a very wise thing to do.</em> Whenever we create new content that we want to present to the public, we have to acknowledge any other material that might contain similar information to ours. Sometimes, this might happen on purpose, like when we research a topic and we find information in other sources that will enhance our research. In this case, we cite our sources as references.
In the case of Jerome, the overlap was accidental. However, if he is aware of it, it is still a good strategy to acknowledge it for several reasons.
Listeners will be aware of the overlap, so they will be less likely to accuse him of plagiarism (claiming another person’s idea are our own).
They will also be more patient with redundant information, instead of getting bored.
It will show that Jerome cares about the proper acknowledgement of sources of information, so they are more likely to trust the rest of his speech.
Finally, the audience is aware of the fact that Jerome could not have predicted this overlap, so they will appreciate his resourcefulness for having a strategy to work around it.
Credibility.
<span>Credibility
has two key segments: trustworthiness and expertise, which both have objective
and subjective segments. trustworthiness is construct more considering
subjective variables, yet can incorporate target estimations, for example,
built up unwavering quality. Aptitude can be comparably subjectively seen, yet
additionally incorporates generally target attributes of the source or message
(e.g., qualifications, confirmation or data quality).</span>
Mate if you want to cheat on an exam you cant litteraly cant sorry nobody knows to
