Answer:
No
Explanation:
No, the UPS employer is not acting legally by firing Kenneth. As long as an employer is able to fulfill all of the requirements of the job then they are protected and cannot legally be fired without proper reason for termination. If the employee gets injured on the job they are eligible for filling a workers' compensation claim. If an employer fires an employee for any on the job related injury then they are doing so illegally and can be sued by the employee for doing so.
Answer:
getting milk for youuuuuu :)
Legal protection mechanisms would be prove useful in product invention.
<h3>What is the product invention about?</h3>
Note that any product invention is one that often needs Legal protection mechanisms if one do not want your intellectual property to be stolen.
Note that the use of Legal protection mechanisms for one's product will make it so that it cannot be easily reverse-engineered.
Learn more about legal protection from
brainly.com/question/14479936
#SPJ12
Answer:
no all forms of speech are not protected by first amendment
Answer:
Option A
Explanation:
In simple words, An injunction relates to the lawful and equal solution in the context of an unique court judgment which obliges a party to do or withdraw from particular acts."If a court allows use of an exceptional solution for an injunction, it orders the behaviour of a group and achieves so with complete coercive forces."
A group who refuses to comply via an order is liable to civil or criminal charges, including potential monetary fines and even incarceration. You may also be threatened with obstruction of trial. Rebuttal-injunctions are court rulings that prohibit or undo the execution of another order.