Great can prevent and minimize the number of deaths, while still making sure the criminal doesn’t get away
Marbury v. Madison was the case which gave the Supreme Court the power of judicial review.
Explanation:
Marbury v. Madison was the case in which the Supreme Court, where the Court asserted its authority for judicial review, calling a law unconstitutional.
In the end of the Judge’s opinion in this judgment, Chief Justice John Marshall explained that this is the responsibility of the Supreme Court to reverse the unconstitutional law because it is necessary result of a Judge’s pledge to maintain the writings of the Constitution as directed in Article 6 in our Constitution.
The Judicial review can be defined as the power of Supreme Court to check and decide in case of a violation of existing law.
Some of the sources that can be biassed when it comes to evaluating the current American presidency compared to past presidents include current executive members
Other biased sources include the following:
- Political party members of the President,
- Previous schools the current President attended,
- Family of the current President
- The political party the President belonged to,
- The special assistants to the current President, etc.
The sources that would be biased when evaluating the current American presidency compared to past presidents are those closest to the President or in support of the incumbent President.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that many sources supporting the current President will be biased towards his cause.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/20646239
