1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Artemon [7]
3 years ago
9

Which of the following statements accurately explains how India is home to one of the world's largest Muslim populations despite

having a national population that is only 12 percent Muslim?
History
2 answers:
Annette [7]3 years ago
7 0
This is because India's population is incredibly large (Approximately 1.252 Billion). When compared to other countries, 12% of 1.252 billion is significant.
Murrr4er [49]3 years ago
5 0

India has about 1225 millions of inhabitants. It is the second most populated country in the world. Although most of them are Hindus (in fact, India has most of the world's Hindus), the third largest group of Muslims live there. That would make around 147 million people that profess this religion.

That is why even though only 12 per cent of the national population is Muslim, India is still one of the world's largest Muslim populations. In the upcoming decades, it's projected India will have the largest population of Muslims and Hindus. It is expected that Muslims will grow faster than Hindus rising from 14.4% in 2010 to 18.4% in 2050.

You might be interested in
What type of intricate hand work is seen in the image above?
Tanya [424]
I need the image to help to answer this question
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
True or False? You would need to cite the source of your information that potato chips are salty.
alexandr1967 [171]

Answer: If it's in your opinion, then no. But if it's somebody else's opinion that you don't agree with, then you do have to cite your sources.

I hope that makes sense!

3 0
1 year ago
Why was the U.S. Supreme<br> Court decision in the Dred<br> Scott case so controversial?
Nadya [2.5K]

Answer: Because the Court ruled that Scott was not an American citizen, any federal lawsuit he filed automatically failed because he could never establish the "diversity of citizenship" that Article III of the U.S. Constitution requires for an American federal court to be able to exercise jurisdiction over a case.

7 0
3 years ago
In the period 1450 - 1750, imperial expansion relied on the increased use of gunpowder, cannons, and armed trade to establish la
MariettaO [177]

Answer:

We can compare the Mongol Empire with the British Empire in three ways:

The Mongol Empire did not colonize as much land as the British Empire.

Several reasons account for this, first, it's a demographic problem: the Mongols were less than the British, so they did not have enough people to populate conquered areas.

Secondly, the lands the Mongold conquered were already inhabited by other ethnic groups and there was not a lot of room.

The British Empire founded colonies in areas that had sparse population: Australia, Canada, the United States, and thousands of colonists emigrated and found room to establish farms.

The Mongol empire was interconnected by land, the British Empire was interconnected by water:

The entirety of the Mongol Empire was located in Eurasia, and spanned across deserts, praires, plains, mountain ranges, and river banks. The British Empire included territories all over the globe, in the five continents, and was held together thanks to the might of the British Navy, by far the most powerful navy at the time.

The British gained more wealth from the Empire than the Mongols:

The height of the British Empire coincided with industrialization. In a positive feedback loop, the British extracted raw materials from their colonies, and transformed them into finished goods and services. This brought enormous wealth to Great Britain.

The Mongol Empire on the other hand, did extract wealth from their colonies, but as they were not industrial yet, they did not so to the same extent.

7 0
3 years ago
which of the following explains one important reason behind Europeans' decision to rely on Africans, rather than American indige
Semmy [17]
Typically, the main reason why the Europeans decided to rely on the Africans for labor on American plantations rather than on American indigenous people because Africans are longed been exposed to small pox and they have already developed immunity in most of the common European diseases.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Complete the paragraph about the Cherokee Indians during Andrew jacksons presidency ?
    9·1 answer
  • A major factor in john kennedy's 1960 presidential victory over richard nixon was
    11·1 answer
  • Here’s what I need help with
    15·1 answer
  • HELP!!!!!!! IF I DONT PASS I WILL FAIL MY CLASS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    5·1 answer
  • Patients went through ___ before they were given medical care.
    13·1 answer
  • What were the four questions posed by the White Citizens Council to candidates for public office?
    8·1 answer
  • Explain the economic crisis and depression of the 1890s, and assess how the second Cleveland administration reacted to it.
    15·1 answer
  • How did President William McKinley expand the influence of the United States across the world?
    13·1 answer
  • Please help me real fast please help
    6·2 answers
  • How would the boycott have affected African American workers, both male and female?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!