Answer:
Authoritative parenting
Explanation:
Authoritative parenting style is defined as the process of raising one's child by using different means altogether e.g love(warmth), sensitivity, and boundary setting. positive reinforcement, negotiation and reasoning are used by parents to lead or quide their kids. Mostly they try not to use threats or punishmentsas a means of parenting. This style is used commonly by the elite,educated, middle class families. Children of authoritative parents are more most times independent, self sufficient, socially accepted, academically sound and well-mannered. Authoritative parents wants and demands total obedience and submission from their kids. Kids also with authoritative parents at times has depression issues as an effect of authoritative parenting.
Answer: (B)
The court ruled that political action committees (PACs) could accept unlimited contributions for making "Independent Expenditures"
Explanation:
Political Action Committees (PACs) are independent groups created to raise money in support of a particular candidate.
Prior to the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case, the amount of money that could be contributed to PACs was limited.
In 2010, the supreme court ruled in favor of Citizens United, in the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case.
The ruling was that corporations and unions were allowed to spend as much as they wanted to, in support of their chosen candidates as long as the corporations were independent of the campaigns. Therefore PACs could receive unlimited contributions.
According to the Supreme court, political spending is protected under the 1st amendment, as it is a form of free speech.
This was an important case as it helped ease the restrictions on political spending.
<span>The Sons of Liberty were not justified in their treatment of the loyalists because they were just being loyal to what they new</span>
Answer:
D: They were fearfull when he refused to disband his army
Answer:
yes, Sally is legally entitled to the home
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question in regards to the situation at hand, we can say that yes, Sally is legally entitled to the home. This is because with the verbal agreement that Sally made with Laura, she was granted consideration in exchange for helping and caring for her. This is a legal term describing value that is interchanged between two parties. Which in this case the value is caring and helping Laura in exchange for being named an heir to her home.
