Answer:
believed that neither the child nor the environment controlled development.
Explanation:
James mark Baldwin believed that nature and nurture all contributed in development. In other words, a kids environment affects his behaviours just in the same way hereditary factors and mental processes affects the child. None controlled development absolutely in this sense as development of a child is left in the way nature and nurture/environment interact in child's development
The answer is: [A]: Designing an effective compensation package .
____________________________________________________________
Note: A well-designed compensation package is one of the most effective methods connecting <span>the interests of managers with those of stockholders.
</span>_____________________________________________________________
The answer is true. (here's extra stuff because my answer is apparently too short blah blah)
Answer:
an ambiguous figure-ground relationship
Explanation:
Figure-ground relationship: In psychology, the term "figure-ground relationship" is described as one of the different principles that are being included in the Gestalt principles related to perception. It represents that an individual's perceptual system tends to separate different stimuli into either ground elements or figure elements.
However, in an ambiguous "figure-ground relationship", the relationship can be interpreted in various ways.
In the question above, the given phenomenon is called as an ambiguous "figure-ground relationship".
<span>This is an incorrect statement. Because ones culture plays such an important role in how we communicate to begin with, to suggest that it has an unimportant role in our interpersonal communication is not factual. We need to have knowledge of each other in order to effectuate proper communication, which cannot be achieved without a basic understanding of each other's culture.</span>
