Answer:
A). Was replaced by someone who is below the age of 40.
Explanation:
Prima Facie Case of discrimination(Title VII, Civil Rights Act, 1964) is elucidated as the case in which the petitioner possesses adequate evidence to validate his complaint or allegation and prove that he/she has been discriminated against by their employer. To make such a case, the plaintiff is required to present sufficient evidence to prove to the judge or convince him/her to deduce that the discrimination from the employer's end took place.
As per the question, to make a 'Prima facie case' against the employer Milford is required to not let disclosed or established that he 'was replaced by someone who is below the age of 40' as this would influence the credibility of his allegation and make the judge infer a decision against him(due to the age factor). Thus, <u>option A</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
Please explain.............
Answer: Dissociative fugue
Explanation:
Dissociative fugue is a disorder where an individual experiences leaving their environment for some time coupled with experiencing amnesia and loss of memory considering what happened that period they were away.
It is a rare disorder.
Jerome's inability to remember the life he lived a certain time is referred to Dissociative fugue
Answer:
Stimulus discrimination
Explanation:
Stimulus discrimination is a term that is used in both the concept of classical conditioning and ope-rant conditioning. It is the concept about to differentiate between two same stimuli. It is a concept in which a person or animal will learn to discriminate the difference between the conditioned and unconditioned stimuli.
Thus in the above statement, In Pavlov's classical conditioning, the dog discriminates between the conditioned stimulus (bell) and unconditioned stimulus buzzer.
