Answer: D. The actual value of the contract is less than $30 million for each year he plays.
Explanation:
Given that Mark sherzer will be paid $15 million per year for 14 years reflects a contract whose value at the time of signing is ($15 million × 14) = $210 million. However, the payment would not be paid at the of signing but spread over a period of 14 years with $15 million being splashed out annually. However, considering the time value of money, whereby the present value of a fixed amount decreases with time. Hence in actual sense, the $210 million face worth of the contract will actually be less than $30 million [$210/7(playing years)] as time progresses on the fixed amount paid yearly due to reduction in the value of the present value as time progresses.
Answer and Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follow:-
1) Marginal propensity to consume (MPC) for this economy is 0.75 as it denotes the spending of the household and saving of 0.25 and the spending multiplier for this economy is
= Spending Multiplier(M)
= 1 ÷ 1 - MPC
= 1 ÷ 1-0.75
= 1 ÷ 0.25
= 4
2). Decrease in government purchases will lead to a decrease in income, generating an initial change in consumption
= -Amount of Government Decrease Purchases by × MPC
= -$250 billion × 0.75
= -$187.5 billion
3). Decrease income again, causing a second change in consumption
= Amount Decrease in Government Purchases × MPC
= -$187.5 billion × 0.75
= $140.6 billion
4).Total change in demand resulting from the initial change in government spending
= Amount of Government Decrease Purchases by × Spending Multiplier(M)
= $250 × 4
= $1,000 billion
= $1 trillion
As we can see that the income falls by $1000 billion in the end, so AD shifts to the left by the size of $1 trillion
In the question the graph is missing. Kindly find the attachment for both of question and answer
Well mainly extemporaneous speeches can be hard, finding the right words without advanced notice may not be for every speaker. But trust me! No need to worry..... :) The extemporaneous speech is a perfect balance!!!!! This speech involves the speaker's use of notes and some embellishment to deliver a speech. To clear this up, a speaker who uses this method would have note cards or prompts that guide him from point to point, but he uses his own words as he goes along. What makes this different than an impromptu speech is that he has a loose guideline for his speech. He did not memorize anything....... he just used cues to know where to go next.
There are advantages but there are disadvantages to this type of speech sadly..... :( For one, the audience will think you are a genius. You used few notes and appeared to know everything about the topic. But this is not something that can be done quickly. The same fact finding and research used for other types of speeches must be used here. The speaker also must rehearse this speech for timing, rhythm and flow. Now, if shooting from the hip is not your style, you may want to consider reading your speech!!!! :) But ya. I hope this is better. XD sorry about that.
Answer:
<u><em>Less likely to expand.</em></u>
Explanation:
When ever interest rates rise in an economy, the soul purpose of that is to control inflation by influencing the people to save more and consume/spend less.
Hence, when the interest rates will rise, Kathleen will be moving away from the expansion process as she will have to borrow the money at more cost than before, hence increasing the risk of return from the expansion process. Hence this will lead to the demand for loan-able funds to slope downwards.
Hope this helps you. Good Luck.
Answer:
(1)
Fees revenues 42,600
Total expenses 1.92 x 4260 = 8179.2
<em>Net income 34,420.8</em>
<em>(2)</em>
Fees revenues 42,600
Variable cost 2,982
Contribution Margin 39,618
Fixed Cost 14,400
Net Income 25,218
Explanation:
(1)
We multiply by the garment cleaned
10 x 4,260 = 42,600
0.7 x 4,260 = 2982
and distribute the fixed cost among the normal capacity
14,400 / 7,500 = 1.92 fixed cost per garment cleaned
.7 + 1.92 = 2.62 cost per garment
(2)
We do not include the fixed cost in the unit cost, we subtact them completely as an expense.
