Answer:
I would have to say that its probably gonna be B
Explanation:
that one seems most likely
Answer:
$5,360
(not given in the options)
Explanation:
Depreciation is the systematic allocation of cost to an asset based on estimates. It is given as
Depreciation = (cost - salvage value)/useful life
When originally purchased, a vehicle costing $23,040 had an estimated useful life of 8 years and an estimated salvage value of $1,600
Annual depreciation = ($23,040 - $1,600)/8
= $2,680
After 4 years
Accumulated depreciation = 4 × $2,680
= $10,720
The net book value then
= $23,040 - $10,720
= $12,320
Since the asset's total estimated useful life was revised from 8 years to 6 years and there was no change in the estimated salvage value
New depreciation = ($12,320 - $1,600)/2
= $5,360
The depreciation expense in year 5 equals $5,360
Answer:
increase both aggregate supply and real output.
Explanation:
A rise in productivity makes it possible for each and every firm to rise the greater amount of output. due to this aggregate supply will rise which will lead to increase in the real output.
Also the rise in productivity increase the aggregate supply and the AS curve would be shifted to right that rise the real output but reduce the level of the price in the new equilibrium output level
Therefore the above represent the answer
Answer:
<u>Predatory</u>.
Explanation:
This predatory pricing strategy is used when a company aims to create entry barriers for new competitors, significantly lower the price to gain new customers and drive competitors away. The cons of this strategy is that in addition to being illegal, lost revenue is not always recovered, and there are other factors that drive competitors away, not just price.
<span>The question refers to whether that scenario describes a competitive market, and the answer is - no. This scenario that you have presented us with is not an example of a competitive market because there is no free entry. Because firms cannot freely enter this market, this cannot be said to be competitive, because there are no companies to compete if there is only one firm involved. </span>