Answer: $0
Explanation:
Life insurance proceeds are generally considered to be tax exempt in order to ease the burden on the bereaved which means that Jason does not have to report any gross income from receiving this insurance proceeds.
If Jason does not collect all the proceeds at once however, and leaves some or all of it with the insurance company to accumulate interest, he will have to pay taxes on that interest.
For Q1, you have to set these equations equal to each other because it is asking how much of x is necessary to make the same amount of y, so:
3995 + 225.50x = 6500 + 100.25x
solve for x:, and get x=20
so 20 tons of sugar will give the companies the same cost.
For Q2: you need to plug in x=20 into either one of the original equations, and solve for y because this will give you the cost of transportation, so:
y= 3995 + 225.50(20)
y=$8,505 for the total cost
A discount bond is also called a <u>zero coupon bond</u> because the owner does not receive periodic payments.
A discount bond is a bond that is issued for much less than its par—or face—fee. discount bonds can also be a bond currently trading for less than its face cost inside the secondary market. A bond is considered a deep-cut price bond if it's far bought at a substantially decrease price than the par fee, normally at 20% or more.
A zero-coupon bond is a bond that pays no interest and trades at a reduction to its face price. It is also known as a natural cut price bond or deep cut price bond. U.S. Treasury payments are an example of a 0-coupon bond.
Coupons are the promised hobby payments of a bond, paid periodically till the adulthood date of the bond. The coupon rate determines the quantity of every coupon fee of a bond. The coupon rate, expressed as an APR, is about by using the issuer and said on the bond certificate.
Learn more about discount bonds here brainly.com/question/16748047
#SPJ4
The executive is exhibiting a mission-driven leadership characteristic.
Answer:
The answer is NO.
Explanation:
The answer is NO since the tax cut does not equate or rather would not be an effective stimulus due to the fact that debt reduction would not stimulate or increase consumption.
To properly understand the narrative of the question and the answer herein, let us define what effective stimulus is.
Effective stimulus or as preferably known as An economic stimulus is the utilization of funds or design of that helps agitate growth during downtime or recession in a country. The decision makers of a country mostly utilize the tactics of giving rebates and increasing government expenses to name a few.
Now relating it back to the question, since the intention of the rebate is to ease payment on tax does not equate to increase in consumption, the answer is a NO.
