Even though all of the above reasons may be critical pull factors, we could safely lean towards option B, <em>higher wages</em>, as the most indicative answer. Mexicans did not necessarily get better jobs than they had back in their native country, where they may even have been skilled and educated professionals; in fact, wages may have been significantly higher in comparison to their earnings at home, allowing them for having a better quality of life and affording medical care, which tends to be expensive in the USA. Education is not necessarily free -especially at its highest levels, which would help migrants and their offspring to still further improve their quality of life- but then again, higher wages could open the possibility of accessing some private higher education.
If this is a true or false question then it’s true.
In both, the people get to decide a lot of the choices the govt makes
Answer: Option(a) is correct option
Explanation:
In terms of qualitative research, data saturation is signified through enough quantity and quantity of data information for repetition. When no new information is seen in data then it is saturation point where repetition of data takes place.New data gathering stops in such case.
Other options are incorrect because data saturation is not seen when special data analysis method is used, for elimination of data that has been repeated more than three times and number of participants are more than required .Thus, the correct option is option(a).
The answer is "party machine".
Political machine, in U.S. legislative issues, a gathering association, headed by a solitary supervisor or little absolutist gathering, that summons enough votes to keep up political and authoritative control of a city, province, or state.
