Answer:
Burke most likely disagreed with the radical course, the French Revolution had taken.
Explanation:
Burke himself was a British member of Parliament of Irish origin. He was supporter of classic liberalism but was equally admired by conservatives.
He also believed in self-determination and was critical of the British actions in the thirteen colonies.
He was also written extensively on the French Revolution and followed it for many years. While he believed in the overall cause of the movement, he did not agree with the extremist approach of the Jacobians.
In a letter, he referred to them as savage men, with very little morals if any.
Answer:
I planned to made by Frozen-yogurt shop filled with several menus using typical ingredient that's used for Indonesian Desert. Due to the differentiation of product, my yogurt shop would be the only shop that could offer unique taste from another culture and will make me have a competitive advantage towards other shop.
Explanation:
They believed the king did not view them as equal citizens with the right to petition
Answer:
the Kingdom of France of Louis XIV
Explanation:
That was where royal power was solidified domestically in the civil war of the Fronde.
Answer:
B) Judiciary Act of 1789.
Explanation:
John Marshall ruled on this case as the Chief Justice. He first answered that Marbury had a right to his job because it had been signed and approved. The actual delivery was a custom, not a requirement. He then ruled that a writ of mandamus (a type of court order) was the correct way for Marbury to rule. Finally, he noted that the Judiciary Act of 1789 allowed the Supreme Court to make this kind of ruling.
<em>The next question was who could decide this issue. Marshall ruled that the Supreme Court could decide it because the Judiciary Act of 1789 said that they could. However, Marshall said that a section of the Judiciary Act was unconstitutional. That section allowed the Supreme Court to make a writ but the United States Constitution did not. Therefore, that section was unconstitutional and the Supreme Court could not make a writ for Marbury.
</em>
Marshall looking over the Constitution and the statute is judicial review, a statement that the Supreme Court had an independent power to determine whether something was constitutional or not.