Answer:
What is the expected dividend yield for Portman's stock today?
d. 6.40%
Suppose Portman is considering issuing 62,500 new shares at a price of $26.78 per share. If the new shares are sold to outside investors, by how much will Judy's investment in Portman Industries be diluted on a per-share basis?
a. $0.52 per share
Thus, Judy's investment will be diluted, and Judy will experience a total loss of $0.52 x 7,500 = $3,900
Explanation:
cost of equity = Re = risk free rate of return + (Beta × market premium) = 5% + (0.90 x 6%) = 10.4%
dividend in one year = $1.68 x 120% = $2.016
intrinsic stock price = $2.016 / (10.4% - 4%) = $31.50
expected dividend yield = dividend / stock price = $2.016 / $31.50 = 6.4%
Judy's loss per share = ($31.50 - $26.78) x (62,500 / 562,500) = $0.5244
Answer:
Contribution margin per unit: $42.9
Total contribution margin: $8,580
Explanation:
The contribution margin per unit is calculated by calculating the total contribution margin, which is basically the total sales, minus the costs of production, in this cae we have that we sold:
60 regular chairs
140 executive charis
Now the total in sales is:
Regular sales: $6,000
Executive chairs: $23,800
The variable cost of each is:
Regular chairs: $3720
Executive chairs: $17,500
We add up the sales and withdraw from it the total variable cost:
29,800-21,220=8,850
The total contribution margin is equal to $8850.
And the contribution margin per unit is given by dividing the total contribution margin by the number of units sold:
8850/200= 42.9
So the contribution margin per unit is 42.9 dollars.
Explanation:
Let’s explore one by one as proposed:
An oil cartel raises oil prices: all prices in the oil-related products will increase making it more expensive for companies to be able to afford employees. As the US economy is heavily based on oil import and consumption, the unemployment rate (let´s call it UR from now on) would increase. Countries that export more than import could benefit from this scenario.
The U.S. dollar gains value against foreign currencies: It would be more expensive to produce goods in the US as its currency becomes stronger. Hence companies could choose to produce overseas, increasing the UR. One of the factors that attract investments is a cheap currency, meaning that a company could operate there at lower costs than anywhere else.
American consumers expect higher income in the future: As fights about average salary would arise between employees and companies, igniting even sindicalization, its proper to think that the same as above could occur; companies could choose to produce overseas in countries less demanding of labor rights and income, such as China provinces (I would recommend for you to watch American Factory, a awarded Netflix documentary about that subject).
Brazil experiences economic growth and increases its demand for U.S. exports: as I said in the first alternative, a country that has increased or more expensive exports could benefit from that creating more jobs, in this case decreasing the UR. If Brazil demands more US products, more has to be produced by the country, which would mean more people employed in this attractive sector.
U.S. real estate values rise: to be honest, it only affects indirectly. As housing becomes more expensive, people have to work more to be able to afford housing. That would mean they seeking better-paying jobs or in the absence of those being homeless of at least unable to buy a home. We could argue that the UR would decrease because it becomes more expensive to afford housing and hence people would migrate more but that’s a long shot rationale.
Answer:
Y = 300
government multiplier 2
output demanded increase by 20
If income tax is applied:
Y = 272.72
multipliers: 2.253775
increase 22.53775 billons
As disclosure it has a larget effect when the income tax is levied based on income rather than a flat rate.
Explanation:
DI = Y - 100
C = 30 + 0.6(Y - 100)
C = 30 - 60 + 0.6Y
C = 0.6Y - 30
Y = C + G + I
Y = (0.6Y -30) + 120 + 30
Y = 120 / 0.4 = 300
C = (0.6)300 - 30 = 150
With C we solve for the multiplier:
150/300 = 0.5
1 / (1 - 0.5) = 2
10 x 2 = 20
If variable that:
C = 30 + 0.6 (0.75Y)
C = 30 + 0.45Y
Y = 0.45Y + 120 + 30
Y = 150/.55 = 272,72
C = 30 + 0.45Y = 152,72
Propensitivity to consume:
152.72/272.72 = 0,5563
multiplier:
1 (1 - PMC) = 2.253775073
10 nillon will icnrease x 2.25377 = 22.54 billons
Answer:
Vo = <u>C1 </u> + <u>C2 + V2</u>
1 + k (1 + K)2
Vo = <u>$129,600 </u> + <u>$129,600 + $3,200,000</u>
1 + 0.14 (1 + 0.14)2
Vo = $113,684.21 + $2,562,019.08
Vo = $2,675,703.29
The correct answer is C
Explanation:
The current value of the business equals cashflow in year 1 divided by 1 + K plus the aggregate of cashflow and sales value in year 2 divided by 1 + k raised to power 2.
